• Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe not enough people around the city know about Scarecrow, and what an amazing archive it is. Scarecrow is where you can go when the movie you’re looking for isn’t streaming, isn’t available anywhere else. Access to the history of the movies is what they offer, with maybe more movies in their collection than not.

    It’s not frickin’ Blockbuster, it’s important. Anyone who loves movies and has some money should pitch in. SIFF should pitch in; they’d be a good match.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why not like… Digitize and set up torrents? I promise there’s data hoarders out there that will would love an archive like that.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They’re trying to raise 1.8 mil to keep a single blockbuster open. Physical media isn’t profitable anymore. Though I guess they’re trying to preserve that rather than the movies themselves.

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Have you been to scarecrow? Every time I go, I get a vivid sense of the scope of cinema as an art form. It’s humbling and tantalising, like I’m crawling through a dragons hoard looking for just the right treasure.

            You wouldn’t call it “a blockbuster” if you’d been there.

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I appreciate that it’s not literally like a blockbuster, but they’re running a giant physical media rental archive. The only ones that can really participate are locals, and it’s up to the locals to prop them up. Now if they solicited donations to digitize and make available their collection for archival purposes? That’d turn heads.

              • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I’m not against digitisation and preservation, but their collection is by no means solely in the realm of public domain works. They keep current, and cast a wide net. Getting digital streaming rights to everything they’ve got would be a legal-logistical nightmare even for a startup with billions in venture capital.

  • Broken Troland@social.seattle.wa.us
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    @pruwybn Already planning that my next date night, we’re going to go to Scarecrow and each find a movie we’ve never seen, or ideally even heard of, and rent it based solely on the cover. Given the size of their collection, I think the hardest part will be picking only one thing at a time.