Hahahahahah

This and your username simply reads as short-sighted, uneducated and immature. Not all change is good, and by definition, some things being conserved is good. However, the balance must be struck, and in the UK we have a long and reasonable history of it ocillating between polarities every few years.

However, 23 years of Conservative rule is not anything close to balance. Austerity and all. Change is sorely needed. The profiteering and upward soak of money must tilt in the other direction for a while, for the sake of people like in the original post.

Reasonable. Im sure my assertion wasnt 100% watertight

I don’t wish to be cruel or unpleasant and i appreciate the reply, but this really doesnt grasp what i outlined before

… that doesn’t invalidate my point at all - their choice of religious affiliation does not define the religion. Just as in my example, the theoretical “Terrorists of America” don’t get to define what American values are, just because of their name. A counter group could take a similar “America” themed name with completely opposite values and objectives and it wouldn’t mean jack shit.

If terrorists decided to use “America” as branding, then saying “home of the brave my ass” would be as equally invalid a statement.

I think the HR officer just climaxed

No, its not.

Ever heard of “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind?”

Latin America as a whole has absolutely zero advice to offer the rest of the world regarding domestic moral principles, I’m afraid.