I was a park service employee when this administration began and the back breaking speed everyone bent over and let Trump have his way was disgusting.

I’m talking entire HR departments working fucking COMP TIME (not even OT) just to make sure their colleagues are fired as quickly as possible. Like damn policy allows you to take up to 3 sick days no questions, call out and let people have a few more days of pay.

Everyone with a conscience in leadership instead of trying to resist just resigned day one. The rest fell in line.

I was disgusted and disappointed

So you transport and utilize WMDs on the daily?

I don’t believe he knows a thing. The people he put in charge of his policy do know these things

He’s a professional he’d just go fent lean at the UN podium

No that’s not what the judges ruled at all or how civil cases work.

Civil cases do not set precedent in this way. Yes they can be used to support other cases, but in civil court each case is examined through it’s own merits.

Even if it did work the way you suggested (it doesn’t but for fun), this ruling would only apply to the state of Ohio since it was ruled on by that state’s court. Meaning companies would then have to produce Ohio exclusive boneless wings with bones and distribute them only in Ohio. Which would be not only be expensive, but also ensure their customers stop buying their product.

That case does at least make some sense. All meat products can contain bone due to them being from you know animals.

Basically they felt that encountering bones in a meat product is a normal, acceptable, and understood risk.

Now if he was give a plate of boneless wings and each wing was full of bones that would be a different case entirely.

This was an inadvertent bone fragment. Can happen in any meat product.

Ah yes the frivolous attachments of rent, food, and electricity

You know what makes cutting my salary hard? Everything is far too expensive. Kids even more so.

This type of mentality was way more common maybe 30 years ago but it’s eroding away these days

As an American, while I can’t tell you if this OP is serous, I can tell you there are many here that do feel that way

Oh no it’s worse, we’re a developed nation with global military capabilities that’s becoming (is?) authoritarian

Why tax actions are in some places already

It’s not free in every region, but it’s still practically free when compared to some countries

The math does several limit the possible number of births. Only about 1,000 of those people would have been female and even if we’re generous and assume 80% were of child bearing age that gives you 800 women that could have children.

That’s going to be an incredibly low birth rate and it’s very unlikely each woman would be having a child each year.

From my understanding of the subject the current consensus is the bottleneck did happen. There’s been fluctuations in the exact number, but under 5,000 is what is most widely supported by the evidence.

The only debate I’m aware of is the exact timing and cause of the bottle neck. It was widely believed a volcano eruption was responsible, but that has become more discredited. It appears the population decline occurred before the eruption and took a significant amount of time to climb after the eruption.

Unfortunately that’s still not quite right.

The individual was, potentially, “evolved”. But the population “reverted” back.

Individuals cannot evolve, but more importantly there is no “reverting back” evolution moves in one direction. It’s the slow slow change in the genetics of an entire population.

Additionally, rocks slides and evolution are not really comparable. As you said only one rock needs to fall to cause an event that has a definitive start and end. Evolution is an ongoing proccess that never ends and it is infinitely more complex than a rock slide. The issue is we as humans are attempting to categorize an ongoing never ending proccess.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487

It’s been significantly lower than 10,000 at least once in history.

Unfortunately there’s a paywall to the article but the free abstract gives you the critical information. And this is among some of the most up to date research on the topic

Unfortunately no it does not mean that. At least according to the current science of taphonomy.

Populations evolve, individuals do not. Individuals can have genetic mutations that improve their ability to reproduce which impacts evolution.

Parents of one species cannot give birth to a new species. Sure their offspring may look closer to what we associate with one species or another, but those genetics are held within the parents and greater population. You can have an individual born that appeared strikingly like a modern human, but if their population hasn’t genetically changed enough their offspring go right back to looking just like any other precursor to modern humans.

It’s messy and annoying. People love to have a definitive starting and ending point, but the world just doesn’t work that way. There’s are reason the start of a new species is given as an estimate that ranges tens of thousands to even sometimes hundreds of thousands years.

Although there are lots of ongoing arguments on where we draw these lines because it is arbitrary to a degree. However, there is absolutely no acceptance that parents of one species can give birth to another. That just isn’t evolution.

Now that’s the scientific answer. I think the more philosophical questions around what is human are much more interesting. Where should that line be drawn in our deep past? When is the psyche truly human?

So in my professional opinion I’d say no. I studied anthropology and work in Archaeology.

Evolution just isn’t simply fast enough to do that. It’s a very very slow series of changes. There would never be a point that two homo erectus would have given birth to a modern human. Eventually some populations of homo erectus would change so much genetically and morphologically we would then arbitrarily classify them as human, but it would be on a population scale.

So yeah there was never just 1 human.

Honestly this demonstrates the flaws of how we try to arbitrarily classify species.

Nope, just a day where there were people alive and no one died.

It’s really only possible once the population gets lower. So it could also be possible in the future too

Do it in Tallahassee. It’s basically Florida’s last blue city so you’d have a decent chance to get a fair jury