• Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    16 hours ago

    So, anybody that’s ever knowingly handled, trafficked or deployed a Weapon of Mass Destruction on US soil is going to be hunted down by anti terror agents, I’m assuming?

    Doctors, nurses, delivery companies, pharmaceuticals manufacturers, etc, yes?

    Not to mention the number of countries in the world and free agents that now have access to huge numbers of WMDs, all of whom now need to be closely monitored and the US must change its relationship with all of them, given the seriousness of what they now possess.

    And obviously, anybody that’s ever publicly deployed a WMD anywhere will have to be detained if they attempt to enter the USA. Can’t have potential terrorists wandering about the country after all, not if they’re on record as committing the unspeakable act of using a Weapon of Mass Destruction on a peaceful public populace.

    This is just a flimsy justification for America’s military invasion of Canada, given their repeated, official accusations from the very highest levels in their government, that Canada is flooding huge amounts of fentanyl into the USA.

    To claim it is a WMD, after claiming Canada is attacking their country with it, and then to not take any military action against Canada to defend against these WMD attacks, would be admitting military defeat.

    Has the USA admitted that Canada has bested them on the field of battle? Are they too scared to meet Canada head on? Sure seems like it.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      America’s military invasion of Canada

      What does that even look like, the day after US troops occupy TorontoOttowa? Canadians waging an insurgency from the woods, occasionally killing some random cops?