Question in title. Just wondering as I saw France had proposed an initiative to withdraw because of the US’ shenanigans…

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    The most downvoted and most upvoted comments, both say the same thing.
    People are werid.

    • ji59@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Because the most upvoted one thinks NATO is a good thing, but since one unreliable country cannot be kicked out, it should be replaced with another alliance with slight changes. This comment just says NATO BAD.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        NATO is bad tho, because it allows the US to draw other countries into our imperialist wars and allows its members to threaten non-members with reletive impunity.

        To quote Blinken “If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu”. A NATO without America could be benign tho.

        • ji59@hilariouschaos.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          I wouldn’t say it’s that bad. NATO is only defensive, so other members have no obligation to join US wars. I admit, NATO conditions can be used to pressure members, but since everyone is hating attack on Iran or Venezuela, the influence isn’t that big. And sometimes the members fight even against each other in proxy wars, for example US vs Turkey in Syria.

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          A NATO without America could be benign tho.

          It wouldn’t make sense and nothing militaristic can be considered benign.