Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoPhilip Morris lobbying to stop WHO ‘attack’ on vapes and similar productswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square188fedilinkarrow-up1491arrow-down18
arrow-up1483arrow-down1external-linkPhilip Morris lobbying to stop WHO ‘attack’ on vapes and similar productswww.theguardian.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square188fedilink
minus-squareGranixo@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·11 months agoEasily the best answer i’ve gotten on this thread.
minus-squareNeil@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·11 months ago“Maybe bad for your heart” vs “4000+ chemicals taken in by literally inhaling carcinogenic smoke.” I still fail to see how you came to the conclusion vaping is much worse.
minus-squarexmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoI don’t see where they’re arguing that vaping is worse, that’s a strawman, they’re arguing that both are bad.
minus-squareNeil@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months ago“Vapes are even worse than cigarettes, for real.” That is a direct quote from the person I responded to. How is that not clear enough for you?
minus-squarexmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoSure, but they’re clearly wrong in that and in the comment above they conceded the point. You’re just kicking a dead horse at this point.
minus-squareNeil@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoWhat are you talking about? They don’t concede that point in either of the two comments they made. I’m starting to think you’re trolling me and it’s working. Good job, bud. Got me good.
Easily the best answer i’ve gotten on this thread.
“Maybe bad for your heart” vs “4000+ chemicals taken in by literally inhaling carcinogenic smoke.”
I still fail to see how you came to the conclusion vaping is much worse.
I don’t see where they’re arguing that vaping is worse, that’s a strawman, they’re arguing that both are bad.
“Vapes are even worse than cigarettes, for real.”
That is a direct quote from the person I responded to. How is that not clear enough for you?
Sure, but they’re clearly wrong in that and in the comment above they conceded the point. You’re just kicking a dead horse at this point.
What are you talking about? They don’t concede that point in either of the two comments they made. I’m starting to think you’re trolling me and it’s working. Good job, bud. Got me good.