“Good luck with the future, gentlemen,” County Court Judge Kellie Blair said to the pair, as she stepped off the bench at the end of hearing.

    • RickTofu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Too often I see people being called neo-nazis just because they have different world views from the woke herd. I’d rather treat labels like this with caution as it’s far too easy to hurt someone’s image undeserved, especially when biased media starts echoing these claims.

        • RickTofu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like “we shouldn’t let children choose to undergo irreversible, life-altering treatments” or “we should give everyone equal opportunities”

          • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, the thing that already is heavily discouraged and doesn’t happen (unless illegally, which is a whole other issue and has jack to do with your imaginary mob), and the thing that… The “woke mob” already believes in? Alrighty then.

            • RickTofu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              The general consensus of the left nowadays seems to be equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity, very big difference (eg diversity quotas and gender wage gap)

              • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So in this scenario, what exactly is the equal outcome supposed to be exactly? Affording education? Being accepted into a job that you’re qualified for in a diverse setting which is preferred scientifically considering workspaces and study groups benefit more from diversity of lived experience, background and origin? (Chicago Tufts University. “Racial Diversity Improves Group Decision Making In Unexpected Ways, According To Tufts University Research.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 10 April 2006. )

                • RickTofu@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Equal outcome would be for example getting picked for a job position over somebody who is better qualified because you belong to a minority group.

                  • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Does this actually happen as much as you claim it does or are some people pissy that the establishment they applied to decided, between equally qualified candidates, to pick the one that would add to their diversity? Or are you implying (I don’t even need to ask if you’re from the US) that most minorities only ever get a job/scholarship not because of their own efforts, but because they’re receiving handouts and of course could never actually be qualified for anything?

              • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Removing diversity quotas and addressing the wage gap (which you seem to oppose, but it’s probably because you’re just listing trigger words) doesn’t make for a meritocracy and it’s been shown over and over again.

                In controlled conditions, when someone is completely unable to know the gender, race or sexuality of the person they’re judging, minorities have the same merit and are judged much the same as anyone else.

                When you remove those conditions, suddenly, in a magical coincidence, straight white men just happen to think that other straight white men are the most qualified for the job.

                On top of that, people who heard the words “diversity quotas” and assumed they knew everything about them tend to assume they’re mandatory discrimination, then get upset.

                They’re not. Managers aren’t saying “well unfortunately, all these hirely qualified men aren’t eligible because the quota said, so we have to hire this black gay woman who turned up to the interview visibly drunk”.

                Any job tends to have a pool of candidates, any of whom are qualified. If you’ve genuinely been hiring on merit and have ended up with an all male team, that shouldn’t be difficult to demonstrate when scrutinised.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No one calls anyone a Nazi for that. People are called Nazis for being Nazis.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        With that talking point expressed with that vocabulary, you should probably be more careful about whose opinions you adopt.

        When they say “we need to start loading people onto trains”, that’s not just their “different world view” about the role of public transportation.