Like, the site owners/employees/admins/mods are the only ones who choose what to post(and hopefully not extremely bias and a good spread of topics), but the users can still upvote/downvote the post as well as comment and all that?

I like the aggregation mark down style of these sites, but I am not sure about the curation being purely user based. I am curious if the users having a large majority control of the curation hurts the quality, and I’d like to see comparisons if they exist.

  • mob@lemmy.worldOP
    6·
    1 year ago

    I wanted to see alternatives to compare.

    I guess you can consider branching out a distrust of what is known.

    Would that mean you would trust mob mentality over the mentality of an individual as a rule then?

    Tbh though, I’m not sure why you are being confrontational, I just was asking about alternatives for curiosity reasons. It’s nothing I’m really invested in, just wanted to explore.