I always hear people/actors/directors say, this tape or film is x meters long, it is this size, etc. do they really still use physical film? If so why aren’t they using terabytes of storage in a way more compact form?

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          24·
          1 year ago

          Is it just me, or does that not contradict the statement you said of “film doesn’t have infinite resolution”?

          • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
            21·
            1 year ago

            What? Not at all.

            I’m saying we can already scan stuff at way beyond the resolution film is able to record, how is that mutually exclusive with there only being useful detail in the film up to a certain scale?

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              14·
              1 year ago

              We wouldn’t need Ai just a way….

              Yeah you contradicted yourself, that’s why I mentioned you would need Ai and infilling…

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  13·
                  1 year ago

                  I think you completely misunderstood the conversation here, I don’t need stuff mansplained lmfao. I thought we were having a thought experiment on what things could potentially be.

                  And yeah you’ve made multiple contradictory statements regardless of that. I even brought up we don’t have screens to make any of this useful, was that not a big enough hint that it’s not a possibility currently…?