• raptir@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I did, I cancelled Spotify and switched to Tidal because of this, and noted the reason in my exit survey.

    • ripcord@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m…not seeing the problem here. I’m fine with there being a minimum before a check is issued as long as the amount is reasonable, and $3 seems pretty reasonable.

      That’s how it works with a lot of things, including advertising, referrals, etc.

      Maybe I’m missing something?

      • raptir@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not a minimum before a check is issued. If you do not have a certain number of annual listeners on a track you never get paid out for it. If you had 100 tracks that were each streamed by 999 listeners who each streamed them 100 times per year every year, Spotify will no longer pay you a dime, ever.

        I think a key point of confusion is in the way they presented it. They talk about how many songs have “less than 1000 listens” and that those would only make $3, but then their new policy is to deny payment for “less than 1000 listeners.” If each of those listeners streamed the song once per month, you’re talking closer to $40 than $3, and that’s on a per song basis.