• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not really. If you want, you can start conversations on state-run comment sections of government websites. They aren’t allowed to ban you. Just as an example, US politicians are forbidden from blocking people on their official Twitter accounts.

    Everything on the Internet is owned by someone. Until someone comes up with a BitTorrent-type protocol for this stuff, anyway. Someone is paying the costs of hosting and someone is paying the costs of development. The person who pays is the owner. The owner can be a private company, a non-profit organisation, or the state. It depends how you want it.

    For me personally, I think the current model works well enough.

    • cameron_vale@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is it just the subs I go to or does this place go torches and pitchforks on anybody with a strange idea?

      • indepndnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Honestly you wrote your post on a fairly polarizing way. If you wanted calmer discourse around the strange idea, you could have gone with something like “What are your thoughts about this?” instead of “Doesn’t that seem rather fucked up?”

        Edit: also maybe be less combative in your comments, but I’m starting to recognize that this complaint was not made in good faith.