This is a vestige of its training data, which has exemplars of people mentioning that content is unique or creative, or tagging it as such. Ultimately all “AI” just regurgitates the training data.
It gives you things in the style of its training data. The things it gives you are generally novel, however. Go ahead and Google what it produces, you’re unlikely to find much unless you pick inherently generic snippets.
Sure. It’s a fine line, though. Things in the style of anything are that way because they reproduce the patterns of the stereotype – and for AI, the patterns are mathematical and all subsets of the whole. In that sense, they do just regurgitate the training data.
…and so does anyone making anything.
…maybe we are the same as our coming AI overlords…
This is a vestige of its training data, which has exemplars of people mentioning that content is unique or creative, or tagging it as such. Ultimately all “AI” just regurgitates the training data.
It gives you things in the style of its training data. The things it gives you are generally novel, however. Go ahead and Google what it produces, you’re unlikely to find much unless you pick inherently generic snippets.
Sure. It’s a fine line, though. Things in the style of anything are that way because they reproduce the patterns of the stereotype – and for AI, the patterns are mathematical and all subsets of the whole. In that sense, they do just regurgitate the training data.
…and so does anyone making anything.
…maybe we are the same as our coming AI overlords…
…maybe we are the AI
scary music plays