• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s a good messenger service overall. Never had any significant outages, generous file transfer sizes, groups, etc.

    Ignoring any privacy/security debate, it’s really the best message service out there, imo. It does everything you’d want sucha service to do, and you have options for apps to use the service (though the official one is great without doing so).

    It has drawbacks, but so does every messaging service out there. For me, the requirement to use a telephone number is limiting. The encryption being out of standard, and requiring an extra step to use, is another. It isn’t something you want to rely on if you need privacy amd security to be top end, but it’s better that discord by a good bit, and at least it isn’t controlled by Google/alphabet or Facebook/meta.

    If you’re looking into it for the encrypted messaging, look elsewhere since anyone you’d be communicating with that also requires that being at the top of the list is going to already be using something else anyway. Anyone that isn’t into that is already going to be difficult to get on board, so good luck actually using it encrypted.

    But, if you just want a good messenger with decent mass adoption, it’s rock solid. Even my mom uses it a little. So it isn’t only geeks that on it, she’s not exactly fond of extra steps; she’d use sms only if it weren’t for the file transfers and the stickers, which is pretty damn typical of most people lol.

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Unlike WhatsApp, it has a desktop client and you can use the same account on multiple devices at the same time.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Its fine, if you have people using it you must talk with. They have rolled their own encryption standard which is always a risk, but they do have a open source client they support which is nice.

    If your asking about what platform you should use overall without anchored social contacts… Signal is the gold standard right now.

  • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s good for sharing images or videos instead of sending a text messages. Especially if not on an iPhone.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not a meta property. Aside from that, it does what I need it to do, that is serve as a bridge between the apple walled garden and the android ecosystem until standards take hold again in the mobile space. The market fragmentation sucks.

  • Lemming421@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s better than Meta’s data-scraping WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger. At the time I moved to it, it was more user friendly than Signal.

    Assuming of course you don’t mean sending an actual telegram, because I don’t live in the early 1900s when that was cool.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I use it because a lot of Ukraine war bloggers are on there. Pretty much the only reason I have it

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Nah because it’s one of those things I’ve only ever seen recommended by people who get ratio’d everywhere else, meth heads on Grindr and sexual deviants like pedophiles and zoophiles.

    It’s pretty similar with other privacy focused messaging apps, too. The main audience for them are people getting around the law to share stuff. The only time that it’s not shady, is if they’re organizing a revolution or something to fight tyranny; which is not as big of a group as the others.