• XiozTzu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we just stop linking to CNBC and their annoying Adblock policy pop up. Grr

    Also, go Ukraine!

    • megane-kun@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve always understood it as “Group of X most powerful and influential countries”

      So, G7 means the “top seven” and G20 means the “top twenty”. What their criteria for determining the ranking, I don’t know.

      • Adam@geddit.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It basically means that but they are formal, static groups. The group composition doesn’t change based on rankings. Russia was invited into the G7 in the late 90s (and it became the G8) then formally expelled when they invaded Crimea in 2014.

        • megane-kun@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for that clarification.

          However, I’m still not quite sure how they came up with the “We’re the top <insert number here> most powerful countries” claim, since it has always been so arrogant to me.

          Also, how do they even choose which countries would be included in the club? For example, would Indonesia or the Philippines be part of a hypothetical G50? Why?

          • Adam@geddit.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s no objective metric at all. It was really just the most important economic allies of the US in 1975.

            The G20 was partially founded in response to criticism that 7 countries were making economic decisions for the world. The G7 chose who was invited to join. Indonesia and the Philippines are both kind of members (permanent invitees) through ASEAN.

      • Thank you!

        Like you I think it seems pretty arbitrary and I’d go so far as to say uncomfortably imperialistic as I read the other replies.

        Appreciate you getting the ball rolling for me!

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a citizen hard to swallow the llEAdErShIP, no doubt, but broken clock is right twice a day lol

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A cynical bit of me thinks all the other countries know Moscow is a paper tiger, and so taking “the right side” of things becomes politically convenient. True to dictator fashion, any show of weakness is poison.

  • megane-kun@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for that clarification.

    However, I’m still not quite sure how they came up with the “We’re the top <insert number here> most powerful countries” claim, since it has always been so arrogant to me.

    Also, how do they even choose which countries would be included in the club? For example, would Indonesia or the Philippines be part of a hypothetical G50? Why?

  • finally debunked@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This dude has no class. How can you expect anyone to take you seriously when you look like a homeless person?