sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square1147fedilinkarrow-up12.31Karrow-down1140
arrow-up12.17Karrow-down1external-linkYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comsv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square1147fedilink
minus-squareUnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoWell if you want less harmful than wind and solar, why not go for less harmful than nuclear and just go geothermal with the new ultradeep drilling techniques? Literally the 450-1000C on tap as and when we need it
minus-squarerusticus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoBecause this is not currently deployed at scale. We are way past “waiting for the next great technology”.
minus-squareUnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year agoNeither is nuclear now is it.
minus-squarelethargy9220@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoConventional nuclear is deployed at scale, especially in the USA, China, and France.
minus-squaretwelve20two @slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWould it be deployable to most major city areas that have easy access to water?
Well if you want less harmful than wind and solar, why not go for less harmful than nuclear and just go geothermal with the new ultradeep drilling techniques? Literally the 450-1000C on tap as and when we need it
Because this is not currently deployed at scale. We are way past “waiting for the next great technology”.
Neither is nuclear now is it.
Conventional nuclear is deployed at scale, especially in the USA, China, and France.
You forgot the /s
Would it be deployable to most major city areas that have easy access to water?