• Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If one instance gets too big they could just ignore the standard and start adding random tweaks to it. And all the others would eventually have to adapt to that or risk becoming irrelevant by being incompatible with the big instance.

    • HopperMCS@twisti.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Federation allows for choice. Indeed, many AP implementations already add to the base AP stuff. Peertube already does this itself.

      For this to really be a problem, the server software would need to be maintained by the same person running the instance, and they have to have the manpower already to either a) Build an implementation or b) Run a fork of existing software. Both take effort and quite frankly is juice that isn’t worth the squeeze to risk cutting yourself off from the network like that.