• dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Band aid solution. The system remains unchanged. The billionaires still make their profits off of the backs of you and me.

    • triptrapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      UBI wouldn’t aim to get rid of billionaires since they would also receive payments. But it would help get rid of poverty, no?

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        By itself, probably not. I mean, it’s not a bad idea, but it would probably just drive inflation through the roof.

        The part of UBI that would be most beneficial would be the tax structure needed to pay for it. The wealthiest among us would go out of their way to avoid such taxation, and in doing so, they would buy more, spend more, charge less. All the activities they undertake to avoid taxation end up as income to the people they buy from.