• aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If Ukraine enters peace talks now, have they gained anything or put their country in a better position since the original peace talks, which were sabotaged by Boris Johnson and British intelligence, over a year ago? Have they gained any significant territory since what was proposed then? Is their army in a stronger position? Are any gains since then worth the losses?

    Just looking at it from a purely pragmatic and realpolitik perspective, I don’t see how anyone can argue that Ukraine has gained anything significant in this stalemate of a conflict. If they get similar results now, as what was on the table originally at the first peace talks, it means that their Western backers essentially sold a pipe dream to Ukraine that never materialised. Is the collective West ready to explain that to Ukraine, and the rest of the world? That they used Ukraine as a testbed for their weaponry against Russia, sold Ukraine a utopian fantasy that they’d be able to regain significant territory using Western weapons and tactics which never happened, and hundreds of tens to hundreds of thousands of people got killed or injured to accomplish very little.

    • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to Ukraine it was uncovering the evidence of atrocities such as Bucha that ended any chance of peace talks early doors.

      Uncovering mass graves of civillians is likely to do that mind you.

      • zephyreks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        To provide context, we had a large number of videos coming out early in the war showing civilians taking up arms and otherwise impeding the invasion. They aren’t legal combatants by international law, but they’re not exactly civilians that got caught in the crossfire: they put themselves there.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      looks like they got back a bit east of Kharkiv & to the north bank of the Dneipr—long before this last big ‘offensive’ tho. Russia might’ve given that pittance of territory up in a peace deal ooth.

    • nicman24@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      havent they breach crimea lines? they are the offensive now so they could demand more.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        They managed to partially capture a handful of villages in the security zone after three months. They are nowhere close to Crimea. The offensive had been a complete disaster and Russia has so far gained more territory in the north than Ukraine has in the south.