There’s currently rumors, he had bruises on his hands, hasn’t been seen in public in the last few days and his schedule for the next few days has been cleared. It’s rumored that he even cancelled his golf session.
JD Vance said that trump is healthy but he’d be ready to take over if anything would happen.
Also the pentagon pizza place is busy.
It doesn’t appear the pizza index is spiking.
It is now. 222% spike at dominos, which appears to be one of very few open this early.
Other ones are very elevated now too. Maybe they are feeding the troops?
How often do they get to this highest “defcon 1” pizza traffic rating?
Reddit said so
That “source” is worse than Wikipedia.
Most sources are worse than Wikipedia.
But not many are as bad as reddit.
80% of /r/politics: dailybeast thehill newsweek slam a melt down on a rage or whatever. 50k updoots to the left pls
Yeah that’s true. I just think Wikipedia is the worst source one can use to support an argument. So anything below that is basically just “trust me bro” to me.
Once upon a time it was, but it’s pretty reliable now. It very clearly cites sources and has warnings for when things don’t have sources.
deleted by creator
It does cite sources, however, many times I have tried checking sources only to find lackluster support for the statements being made in Wikipedia.
Just today I was looking at this page: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigaer_94
It states, that the building in question was given to a Jewish organization, linking to 2 sources:
Looking at the sources, they just seem to claim that the building was once owned by a Jew. This explains why it might have been given to that organization, but it’s no proof for the statement being made.
I found several things like this over the years. I’d say this is a good 10% of the sources I bother checking.
Maybe German Wikipedia is worse somehow?
All that being said, I do trust Wikipedia mostly. I’m just saying, it’s the bare minimum IMO.
You sound like my high school English teacher from 2003.