Fran Bow . It’s a psychological terror click adventure, available on both Mobile and PC. On mobile I think it has 5 different chapters, and 0 transactions other than the buying price. Really recommend it!

*boop

Maybe the duck was the friends we made along the way

I try to play my Arma 3 abiding to Geneva convention and is quite fun

Your comment seems off, has some references to QGIS (props to QGIS! It made my thesis way better)

I think Jellifyn does. You can also set up watch partys. Navidrome is lighter and more responsive tho.

Your argument is very weak, you are just citing a company that sells vegan food for animals, a very clear conflict of interest.

For instance, I can also cite some Google PR page on how much they care about privacy.

Jupyter is great for data analysis.

Disagree. They showed their arguments, and those seem pretty valid to me, even though I disagree. IMO being open, transparent and promoting community discussion is a good sign.

Silly, but I like those because I can eat bits of it after using them :3

I changed the icon location, and my muscle memory still was trying to open them from the previous location, basically in a complete auto-pilot mode. That led me to a realization of how fucked up the situation was, and eventually helped me uninstall/reduce screen time of those apps.

Apocalypse Now. Damn, what a movie.

Great movie. If you haven’t, you should check out Arrival (2016).

Your comment seems so out of touch with the reality of majority of people. I think you are taking an extremist and unreasonable stance.

OP asked for opinions, commenter stated their opinion in a respectful way. Why are you trying to shut them up?

Yes.

My last experience was around 2 months ago with a driver issue. In the forums, someone linked a solution, and a lot of comments were in the lines of “Seriously? This was already in the newsletter, why are people not reading/subscribed to it. It’s their problem then”. Funnily enough, an actually helpful comment noted that the newsletter solution had a typo that made the solution not work as expected.

Even today, the Arch community is exactly as previously described.

The reference adds stuff like the author, journal or year, so it can be a showcase for the relevance, importance, how new is it, etc. I still find it useful in cases like the presentation not being followed by a paper, or you add visual aids that are not present in the paper yet are not your own work.

Disagree on 7 and 8

For 7: References and sources are a must, unless everything is your own work. They should not be put at the end of the slides because the public does not have access to your file, so they cannot go back and forth to properly read the source like they can in a paper. The way I do this is simply putting “Source: blablablabla” in a smaller font, so the reader can easily recognize it as a source and ignore it if they want to.

For 8: This greatly improves the public’s ability to ask you questions, as they can just say you “Please go back to slide #X”, instead of having to explain the content of the slide.

Keep in mind these are used in my scientific academic background, perhaps outside of it they are not as important.

A report usually contains somewhat useless information, requires more background in the topic and does not allow for easy to ask questions to the author. Slides, written reports, papers, speech, etc. all serve different purporses.