This just feels like an enlightened centrist take or worse, playing cover for bigotry.

Cile is less strawmanning and more exemplifying the absurdity of applying this mentality to literal Nazis and white supremacists.

Can you give an example of your assertion, historical or imagined, where we SHOULDN’T act against acts of intolerance due to some muddying factor?

Republican = not believing in science and/or data

Jokes aside, what a weirdly leading question that doesn’t actually lead anywhere— the only reason it is given a name is because the social dominance of theism necessitated the distinction.

There are also plenty of phrases regarding the rejection of something. Put “anti” at the front of plenty of philosophies or systems and boom, there you go.

You’d rather pay money AND watch ads than sign into a private tracker once a month?