It’s been years since it was released. If you haven’t seen it at this point then saying *spoilers! * can only be seen as sarcastic.

You might wanna use a /s

Elon and Tesla are damn near perfect.

“What the fuck is livestock inversion studies?”, my mother exclaimed with tears in her eyes while her shaking hands grasped the course syllabus.

That’s the dream! Congrats!

Well, book burning is kinda dumb because most of them, if not all, are already digitized. It’s a statement at this point in time. While really stupid and backwards, expression is still a right and freedom that Americans enjoy.

This is unlike other countries where you can be thrown in jail for something even lesser and never have a recourse or trial.

And that makes the image being censored ‘okay’?

Alot of gore though, lol

If you’re looking for a mental kind of creepy, The Haunting of Emily Rose is quite scary.

It’s got jump scares kind of, but it leaves room for your own imagination. Very minimal blood and gore.

My grandma called it the doodely-woodely music.

Oh wow I haven’t heard Ebaums in such a long time. So many good laughs on that site during my senior year and undergrad.

Great movie, BTW. What a concept!

Which side did you fall onto, the people keeping the evil at bay, or the ones fighting to live even if it meant the end of the world?

100%

There’s absolutely ground to wriggle on here. Maybe let’s try to make up a society where this is okay.

I would like to assume in this “perfectly ok to do this society” that the choice is fully open and known to all. As in all people in the society are subject to it. Like a complete random draw.

But then what about innocent people? I would define an innocent as a person who is sinless or hasn’t broken the law. Maybe if you try to do something evil you’re pardoned from this choice? That doesn’t seem right because everyone would do the least minor thing to be considered evil. And children or the neuro diverse might be left out on a huge disadvantage because how would they know what to do to be considered skippable.

Maybe it’s an external force working to destroy the planet. Someone has to be killed to stop it. So maybe innocent could just mean has no power over the process, no ability to affect it, no way to be skipped. If it’s seen that way, I would be kind of satisfied.

How often does this happen? Once a year? A decade? Every day? Eesh what a thought. What would society be like knowing that you might be randomly chosen to just end on a daily basis. It’d be like winning the anti-lottery.

If someone was chosen, in my model, they would be made known to the planet a while ahead of time, maybe 24 hours. And they would be given a huge life altering sum of money to do with however they please prior to being un-alived. Give it to their family, a charity, whatever.

Their name would be known as a hero of some sort, even if unwillingly so.

The death/torture can’t be painless, as the hypothetical implies so maybe there can be like a time limit here? Is this a long time torture thing? That sounds horrible.

Right now, if really feels like I’m trying to make my least favorite thing slightly palatable somehow.

While I see your point, I don’t ascribe to the nihilistic point of view that life has no meaning therefore no reason. I find it dark and disheartening. To me, the fact that we can even have this conversation is a miracle and there’s a certain happiness I get from knowing that despite my suffering and yours, we are still strangers who can engage in a conversation and have fun with it (I hope this is how you feel, too!).

I’m more of an absurdist. While there may be no end to the suffering, we can still derive pleasure and satisfaction from life. We can enjoy it if we want find ways to, because that’s our natural desire, to seek happiness.

If you want to try looking at life like that, then this question becomes MUCH more interesting. Because despite suffering, this society found a way to continue. The question of whether or not it’s moral, or how it’s moral, depends on if life has meaning.

All questions kind of depend on that, no?

I would say “life is a struggle”. Of course it’s challenging, it doesn’t mean that it’s bad.

Regardless, what’s your point?

So everyone including the innocent just ends?

Because regardless of the choice. Innocent people will die.

It’s how quickly you want that to happen I think is what we’re going after.

Is this voluntary? Is it random? Is the person truly innocent? Is this person known or will be remembered? Is it a child? Is the world aware?

I have a ton of questions that lean onto the “slow” side of things.

But I think it’s too easy to say “nope, just end it”.

Not really. It’s more like:

Everyone ending

One innocent ending to keep everyone else alive

That’s more challenging.

For sure the quantity of posts is the same, but the quality has gone down.

You can just feel it all over. My frontpage has little to no good topics anymore. I used to peruse for at least 30 mins easily losing myself. I barely get 5 now before getting irritated with the low effort material.

Absolutely this.

Too few role models on how to act like a well-adjusted and reasonable person. When the smallest social misconduct happens today it’s like people want to either explode into a fit of rage or implode into this crying mess.

Getting a good eye on priority comes from socializing out in the world and or volunteering your time and energy for something that doesn’t pay you money but helps someone in need. It can teach so much at such a young age because you’re surrounded by some of the best and worst people you’ll ever meet.

Daily commuting can also go.

No stranger on the internet will have better advice than the honest local expert.

The only advice I can give for household things is that if you want your investment to actually mature properly, you have to listen to the professionals. They’ll save you lots of money in the long run.