They get mad at the very idea that people can work together and successfully create change, despite numerous historical examples. It’s actively immature to be wholly cynical

Some people are shit at spelling. That’s damn near ableist behavior to suggest that tbh

If you’re the gold store people are selling gold to, you make more money revealing this

Interesting how the price drops so much when you just ban renting apartments out :P

Tbh I wouldn’t be surprised. The bigger question is, does it cause more cancer than it prevents

As a bicyclist and pedestrian, many roads are above safe levels. Others it’s well below. Tbh it’s all arbitrary

That’s saving, not spending… Those things don’t hit the accounts for something like 48 hours.

Honestly I’ve had a different experience. I’ve been wrong, as anyone ever has, on the Internet. And usually the person I’m arguing will accept an apology with grace, and will even get upvotes for doing so. But the apology doesn’t need to be accepted, to still be good to do.

I don’t know if I’d call baking bread a huge financial win

Normal bread = $4-6 or what have you. A loaf of homemade can cost much less; <$1 a loaf easily, and be much better. If you eat a lot of bread or have a family, it will save a ton of money

Sometimes I’ll just ask friends or family to be “moral support” while I clean or do tasks. Fun

Then everyone started driving again.

Japan as well

You are blind. He’s changed many policies and functions of the states for the worse. ICe, anti union policies, anti monopoly policies are tossed to the wayside, selling out the country for a dime. He’s not running like usual.

If you think this isn’t changed, you are blind.

I think it’s worth saying that security theater isn’t pointless. Criminals tend not to be the brightest, and they tend to like to go for low hanging fruit. That makes even the pretense of security somewhat of a preventative, even when security doesn’t work. Same way a fake security camera helps.

The trouble is that they have a ridiculous amount of rights to be racist to people, abuse their power, and screw people over. Basic xray machines and security guards by itself would be reasonable, even as security theater

… Do you know what moral relativism vs moral universalism are?

Those morals are your opinion. They are not fact. Arguing them as fact is already questionable.

There is multiple positions on morals. there is no such thing as a moral which is universally a standard of morals.

I specifically hate car enthusiasts, because their driving around on roads at high speeds and loud engines worsens life for other people. It’s separate from infrastructure concerns. Though I have both.

The straight pipes worsening air quality also doesn’t help.

Antagonizing people only serves to harden their position.

People don’t change their positions just because you act nicely

I’m responding to you asking for a purely moral stance, with a possible counter argument. I’m not suggesting to take without checking, I’m suggesting check and it’s very likely they have.

, it wouldn’t justify dishonesty in return

It would justify not going out of your way to return money to them.

That’s moral relativism, not ethics

There’s no such thing as morals or ethics that are not relative. Stating that has no meaning. When discussing morals, you must be willing to debate the morals foundations themselves. Are you?

An easy opposing argument would be if they’ve done wage theft. Which near every large company has. Or if they’ve used unethical business practices (ditto)

I’m going to shit on people who actively make my life worse. Cars are regressive.

Alao, I didn’t call them a toaster lmfao