Don’t answer this you fools!

Wow that’s very forward of you.

Really out there. Sticking it to… Nobody.

It’s the same picture.

I donno, blood or something.

A lot of what makes up poop is body waste like dead cells.

Not with that attitude.

I make a point to roll down my window so they can see me pointing as I laugh at them.

I can see why you went with 3, surviving open heart surgeries account for at least +1 badass.

Thank you for the proper explanation! They should copy this comment and put it somewhere on their website.

Okay but like, what does it do? That’s what I’m not understanding. Are you able and willing to explain it at all?

I don’t understand the appeal. But maybe that’s because 99% of my games are through steam where this is kind of already a basic feature?

Am I misunderstanding the use case here? Someone explain what is exciting about this, because the post and the link for people who haven’t heard of it didn’t really manage to explain how or why this is cool or useful in any meaningful detail.

Trump is a piece of shit with no redeeming qualities and so are his followers. End of discussion.

You know that people aren’t forced to interact with websites right? Like if I don’t have a choice about if your website is going to show me ads, then I DON’T HAVE A CHOICE to view your website. Those ones that block the entire page until you whitelist them? I just close them and move on with my life. Nobodys product is so important that I will interrupt my day to view their advertising for it. And no website has such a reputation that I am willing to pay them or whitelist them for advertising BEFORE VIEWING THE FUCKING CONTENT.

Fresh air.

To both obviously.

A more genuine response would be “Ads, so I can use an adblocker on them.”

Fuck advertisers. FUUUUUUUUUUUCK paywals.

Valheim was a better game in it’s first version than a lot of the games that are “complete” on this list.

I get where you’re coming from, and certainly some games don’t deserve to even be sold in their “early access” state. However, I think saying none of them should count at all is a bit ridiculous.

Valheim offered hundreds of hours worth of entertainment even in the early versions and has only improved since then. It only takes up 1gb of data through some miracle, and runs fairly well even on the steam deck.

Honestly it puts many of the other titles on the list to shame. Ignoring it because the dev wants to continue providing MORE free updates instead of calling the game finished and then charging for “DLC” is not a reason to punish the studio, if anything they should be looked to as an example of what other devs should do.

Honestly, there were a TON of games I was surprised to find on this list, but Valheim was not one of them.

Multiplayer games are especially vulnerable to the subjectiveness of enjoyment because not everybody has the same set of friends or experiences with their friends in the game, assuming they played with friends at all.

That said, I’ve been playing games for decades and I would put forth that even single player Valheim with no access to multiplayer would deserve to be much higher than the 100 placement on this terrible list.

What made them start in the first place? Sounds like a deranged thing to do.

I didn’t say any of these games were shit. I said that many of them were shit IN COMPARISON to Valheim, which is objectively true.