![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
This doesn’t seem like c/nottheonion material
This doesn’t seem like c/nottheonion material
I wonder why I even read these articles. If these do turn out to be useful it will eventually make its way into technologies I use or buy near me. I don’t have to hunt them out.
Don’t really see the point of forking, instead of landing features and patches as of yet
Full access to currently published copyrighted books was way too much. Even Google just showed snippets or showed abandonware books. They really should have settled.
We do have OpenLibrary BTW! Already does the job, pretty good.
I mean, I see way less bugs when outside even a decade ago.
More of a the natural habitat of insects are still thriving in Mexico and the habitat being wiped elsewhere.
Bugs hitting the front windshield in extraordinary numbers.
Seems like happens in almost everywhere in 2nd & 3rd world countries. :(
Thanks, I was wondering if there was any feature/index issues. Since there doesn’t seem to be any, I will use OL. Appreciate the reply.
Anna’s Archive is legally grey/black. Bookwyrm is clear, wouldn’t mix 'em.
Like that’s my point, why not just use Open library at that state?
Disagreeing doesn’t mean you should get downvoted. I disagree with your sentiment but upvote.
First of all I welcome this idea, and think it’s ok if there’s many different types of encyclopaedia on different perspectives. Now, how will a decentralised wiki deal with something like a rando claiming to be uni professor and inserting thyself in admin position over time? How is activitypub helpful in writing wiki?(Edit credits?)
Finally a site you might find helpful: https://wikiindex.org/ (https://web.archive.org/wikiindex.org/ as it seems to be down)
It’s working, but maybe they want to make it work even more