My crosspost to [email protected] doesn’t seem to have any downvotes, so maybe there?

Edit: Do note that the other thread ended up locked because some Gamergate chuds did show up, but the mods did promptly deal with them.

Funny enough, one of the catalysts was Breitbart pushing it. Because they were trying to push that population segment right wing.

Unfortunately because Gamergaters are still going around harassing women in gaming.

Those of us who aren’t being harassed and sent death threats by them can, sure. But that’s kind of the problem.

The Gamergaters really wanted the game to get bad reviews so they could use it to fuel their self-victimhood.

So, does that mean that AI photos have merit when they win photo competitions, as has happened in the past? Seems like the point he was trying to make would go both ways.

Disqualification seems appropriate. If it is against the rules to use AI photos in a normal photo category and the winner gets disqualified for that, which has happened, and it is against the rules to use a non-AI photo in this category, then the person should similarly be disqualified.

Not sure if the person behind this actually made the point they thought they were? Because it just shows that being consistent in rules and disqualification is good and the contest was consistent.

Craigslist has been spam for quite a while at this point. Even for me in my thirties, I don’t know anyone who has used it legitimately for at least a decade.