TheDankHold
- 0 Posts
- 107 Comments
41·10 months agoWith no right to return it’s still a genocide. Hamas doesn’t exist in the West Bank and Israel still steals their homes and guns them down.
You’re so painfully naive.
Which is what they said. Israel refused negotiations.
There it is. Genocide advocation.
For once a comment where you aren’t cheering the extermination of children you seem evil. At least directly.
Interesting that you can spot this here but double down supporting the exact same type of behavior from Israel.
No the Israeli settlers stealing land in the West Bank is already western imperialism. What they’re suggesting is sending people to stop the imperialism.
Of course if you go to tankie central you get tankies. They’re also acting like Putin didn’t order the shelling and capture of Ukrainian cities and it’s all just (insert kremlin talking point here).
They are a specific niche of political mind. The kind that only thinks western nations are capable of propaganda and evil. Don’t take them as representative of smarter people.
They aren’t going about this in a way that stops this from happening is the problem. You’re so wrapped up in the Zionist narrative that they’ve tricked you into thinking extermination is the final solution.
Britain didn’t get rid of the IRA by bombing and blockading Ireland. There was no ground invasion despite thousands dying in bombings and other violence.
The fact is that the attack in October and others like it happen because the extreme Zionists like Likud have taken steps to ensure this. Because they’re creating a situation where they can be horrifically brutal but hide behind good pr narratives. They literally propped up Hamas at its inception with the stated goal of fracturing Fatah which was a moderate party suing for a two state solution.
As long as Israel keeps killing Palestinians in the West Bank where there IS NO HAMAS, they will keep driving support for any group that resists Israel.
You can get far more innocent civilians on your side if you treat them better than Hamas. Knowing everything we know about how Hamas treats them should tell you just how bad Israel treats them on top of that.
You stop this by removing the war mongers from power first and foremost. As long as Netanyahu’s party has control there can never be peace. Because like Hamas, they want a one state solution too.
They show restraint because they know good pr keeps the foreign investment flowing like a river. It’s so disingenuous to view this conflict in a vacuum with no larger geopolitical aspects to consider.
Sure they could act like Russia is in Ukraine but that’s not how you get your genocide while the world shrugs their shoulders. Don’t be so painfully naive.
Also it’s interesting that your recollection of events starts AFTER the Naqba where Israeli settlers drove Palestinians from their home. Everyone acting like there’s only one group driving hostilities always has an obnoxiously one sided understanding of the provocations that happened.
And as a final note, Israel is held to a higher standard because it hasn’t been rendered destitute by a stronger power. It’s the imbalance of power that makes the position popular. Just like cops should be held to a higher standard than citizens, Supreme Court judges over political pundits, and soldiers over non combatants. The stronger force has the most responsibility to go for peace because their power grants them the most ability to do so.
Israel outguns them by an almost unfathomable degree. Getting upset that they aren’t fighting a conventional war against a military that gets trillions from overseas is naive.
Just cut to the chase and tell them to kill themselves.
Also, do you think IDF soldiers killing kids and journalists and Israeli settlers killing and displacing citizens in the West Bank (a location with marginal Hamas influence) might have something to do with why certain Palestinians might hate Israel? Or are you plugging your ears and insisting it’s just because they’re Muslim?
Yes, I’m an agnostic atheist. That’s why I don’t have an issue actually looking into the specifics of different religions to understand them better.
I said it “removes a way” to do that. Not that it removes any ability to. Try to represent peoples arguments factually next time please.
Even though double speak removed the idea of the word “bad”, they could still try to express the same idea with “ungood” after all. Language shapes how we view the world because it’s how we share our experiences.
All Abrahamic religions are. And it’s also not the point being discussed so you’re deflecting.
The crossing that Israel bombed? You do know why it was closed right?
Ok so the quote is to verbally swing back when insulted. So maybe thinking a video of one Muslim (there are more than a million of them globally) is a reliable metric to judge all of Islam isn’t correct?
And your second link has an interesting comment that you might’ve missed.
“Did you post this up in order to put a veil over people’s eyes on the atrocities the Israeli government committed few days ago by murdering over 60 innocent Palestinian people and injuring 1000s of protesters?
“Re-Examining Banu Qurayzah Incident”
https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/01/01/re-examining-banu-qurayzah-incident/
Safiyyah was freed at Khaybar and married in Khaybar incident too. This had no connection to Banu Qurayza incident:
https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/07/04/safiyyah-huyayy-kinana-and-khaybar-affair/
As for last hour claim, the following is an excellent article which delves into the context around it:
As for Quran 9:29 and other verses, see this please:
https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/05/27/most-misinterpreted-verses-of-the-quran/
Prophet Muhammed’s Charity To Non-Muslims,
(1992) “… that the Messenger of God (p) used to give charity to a household of the Jews, and it continues to be given (that is after his death (p).” (Kitab al-Amwaal by Abu Ubayd al-Qasim Ibn Sallam, page 556)
Prophet Muhammed’s (p) wife, Safiyya gave charity to those who professed another faith (among her family),
(1193) “…that Safiyya, the wife of the Prophet (p) gave charity to two of her relatives, and both were Jews. This (corpus of the) charity was sold for thirty thousand dirhams.” (Kitab al-Amwaal by Abu Ubayd al-Qasim Ibn Sallam, page 556)
Various companions and scholars gave and had given charity to non-Muslims who lived under their protection throughout the earliest days of Islam,
(1994) “…Abd’Allah Ibn Marwan, who said: ‘ I said to Mujahid: ‘ I have a polytheist relative, who owes me a debt. Should I forgo this debt?’ He replied, ‘Yes, and (give something to) strengthen the bonds between relatives.” (Kitab al-Amwaal by Abu Ubayd al-Qasim Ibn Sallam, page 556)”
I’m glad you’ve decided that your culture being kicked out of your homes is no big deal. I’m sure the trail of tears is more of a trail of inconveniences in your opinion.
Keep downplaying genocide you dense jackass.