Law is not Justice
Law is not Justice
Where do I send the beer?
Nice try FBI
I am by far not an expert on this matter, but my understanding is that if people started becoming vocal about that, it’s because most people did not really care or know about the situation until Oct 7, and were bathed in a swarm of news articles since then. It’s hard not to have an opinion on something you know nothing about when you hear about it daily.
Depends on whether you define a crime as a “legal” bad action or a “moral” bad action. While the latter may be problematic, because anyone can have different values, it is still widely considered a bad thing to kill people who did not do anything.
What in the name of tarnation?
Going back to monke is always a valid option
I think Usenet would be closer to the Fediverse than the email
Technically, it is confirmed, but it’s all in the background: once, one proposes to the other (and the other reciprocates), and another time we see a newspaper article about their marriage.
This aside, f*ck this dumb law.
Great read, thanks!
DRMs your board games
I know quite a few people who have downloaded movies. As long as you stay within “reasonable” margins, no one really bothers you
I assume you are talking about 3.b? It says that the usage is prohibited outside the private sphere, so you can’t seed, you can’t upload, but you can have movie nights with friends and family using p2p content.
See my other comment, it’s explicitely stated in 19.4 of the Act on Copyright
Here is the law, taken from the Federal Act on Copyright (https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1993/1798_1798_1798/en#art_19 ):
1 Published works may be used for private use. Private use means:
a. any personal use of a work or use within a circle of persons closely connected to each other, such as relatives or friends;
b. any use of a work by a teacher and his class for educational purposes;
c. the copying of a work in enterprises, public administrations, institutions, commissions and similar bodies for internal information or documentation.
2 Persons entitled to make copies of a work for private use may also have them made by third parties subject to paragraph 3; libraries, other public institutions and businesses that make copying apparatus available to their users are also deemed third parties within the meaning of this paragraph.
3 The following are not permitted outside the private sphere defined in paragraph 1 letter a:
a. the complete or substantial copying of a work obtainable commercially;
b. the copying of works of art;
c. the copying of musical scores;
d. the fixation of recitations, performances or presentations of a work on blank media.
3bis Copies which are made by accessing works that are lawfully made available are neither subject to the restriction of private use under this Article nor are they included in the claims for remuneration under Article 20.
4 This Article does not apply to computer programs.
From what I gathered, she’s pretty much a genius at cracking