![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
IDK, the National Museum of African American History serves fried chicken every day, so they don’t think there’s anything wrong with it.
IDK, the National Museum of African American History serves fried chicken every day, so they don’t think there’s anything wrong with it.
IDK why people are interpreting your question about the mechanics of everyone switching at the same time. It sounds to me like you’re asking more about the bigger picture problems it would solve with society, not whether the sudden change would be able to be handled by the banks. Is that what you’re looking for?
Moving to a credit union is a great idea. I did a long time ago and haven’t looked back.
There are some things they don’t offer, sure, but then for stuff like investments I use dedicated platforms for those which is a better experience anyway.
It wasn’t clear to me from the post that it isn’t genuine. I interpreted the post to mean that it wasn’t famous in some way, just a standard issue dagger, but that it wasn’t a reproduction.
deleted by creator
Don’t forget Englandic people.
Can you give a concrete example so we can understand?
In the grand scheme of things, not paying taxes is also a pretty miniscule thing. The US funding for Israel is pretty big though. If they needed more weapons that your tax dollars would have paid for, I’d guess the tax dollars you paid in the US would go to the same place. I guess the alternative is to live in not-US and not-Israel. But either way, I think the US would just fork up more money anyway.
But the main point I’m making is, bad people will find a way to do bad things. The best way to eliminate bad people is to change their minds.
Ultimately a society is composed of many individuals. We all play a small part in its change.
If you send them the message in plain text they have no way of verifying you aren’t just making it up to get someone you don’t like banned. Keeping it encrypted means they know the sender wrote it.
If it’s with asymmetric encryption, wouldn’t it be possible for the report button to generate a key based on their private key which can only be used to decrypt the given message?
https://www.mintmobile.com/plans/
All plans include unlimited talk and text.
It’s worth it for me and a lot of other people.
Email already has a To: field. There’s no point in writing it in the body.
A professional email would be the same as an informal one. Start with “Hello!” or “Good morning!”.
I believe Java is the best option for this type of application
Why?
Rust’s speed is a cherry on top. The main reason to use it is its language design / correctness guarantees.
I’ve been programming for several decades and understand nuance and subjectivity vs objectivity when it comes to this, and strongly believe Rust is just objectively much better than Java as a language.
One example is that Rust doesn’t have null while Java does. The creator of null gave an excellent talk called The Billion Dollar Mistake about why null was such a bad idea, and said languages shouldn’t not have used it. Instead, the alternative he gives is what Rust does.
Things like this are actually hugely important.
Also, Rust was “most loved” language in the StackOverflow developer survey for eight years in a row for a reason.
Other than Sublinks, I have never seen anyone post about how they really want to work with Java.
Hard disagree. I think Java is objectively bad.
I can give Rust to a completely inexperienced dev straight out if high school and they will be able to write a multi threaded program without data races since Rust was designed so that isn’t possible. That’s one example of many.
Even null is something the creator of null said was an objective mistake, and that concept is embedded into Java, while it doesn’t exist in Rust.
Learning Rust to the point where your code is correct is absolutely not hard at all, which is why it’s so bizarre when people create projects like this.
LMAO, Sublinks devs are so engrained in Java that they want to rewrite Rust in Java, and their survey they send is written in Office 365? They’re a meme.
The Java idea is absurd and shouldn’t be taken seriously.
I disagree with the Lemmy devs’ political views a great deal, but:
Java is a horrible language. Nearly every developer I’ve talked to in the last several decades agrees, even previously hardcore Java devs. Please just stop.
Don’t use AI for writing code, at least not when you’re learning it.
deleted by creator