These jobs held by women that involve automation will not be replaced by artificial intelligence, per se, but by people who have mastered AI.

This is garbage, positing this prediction as a conclusion.

The rest of the article is also garbage, conflating things like the lack of women in executive positions with a skills gap. Women don’t have a meaningful skill gap in white collar work. They do get discriminated against.

It’s all, “women use AI less therefore women should use AI more!”

Fucking garbage.

I don’t know, this level of not knowing what your job is kinda goes past oops sorry.

Maybe, we don’t know how violent the guy is.

That lists afraid.org as a ddns provider.

They are pretty great, I use them as my domain host.

It’s restricted in Canada. What was it?

Sure, construction/delivery/sales are all in the same boat. It’s just more options.

Fyi maintenance jobs sometimes supply a company vehicle. Shortly after I bought my car at 26, I was hired as a technician and they supplied a van.

Oh weird

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-apr-12-me-snoop12-story.html

What

I support this affirmative action and will be voting for Snoop Dogg in the upcoming election

It is truly the year of the Linux desktop.

Intellectual properties?

It’s Roblox stuff you can buy, it’s not power users that are the target demographic

Can you be my new best friend

Nah buddy thinks Walt is alive but very, very cold

That’s not how we use language. If he took a vacation in another state, called himself a professional engineer, never went home and joined the new states engineering org, he wouldn’t be wrong calling himself PEng before he joined the new org.

A retired doctor is still a doctor if somebody needs one on a plane.

Your forum example is different from this.

The forum poster is soliciting advice, for the purpose of continuing use of the construction. The poster is relying on the engineer for their safety.

If a neighbor looks over the fence, and tells you “looking good Joe!”, it won’t create any sort of relationship between you, and if it is in fact not good the neighbor isn’t liable. You weren’t relying on their comment.

The engineer is publishing an open letter about work that somebody else completed, that they were never involved in. They aren’t being relied on to approve the continued use of the construction. This is the same as lawyers blogging dissenting opinions on rulings or commenting on legal proceedings in areas they haven’t passed the bar.

Yeah wow it’s like I thought ( the right holder being able to dick around writers)

It was strikingly clear to the Court that Anderson’s work was a derivative work; that under 17 U.S.C. section 106(2) derivative works are the exclusive privilege of the copyright holder (Stallone, in this case); and that since Anderson’s work is unauthorized, no part of it can be given protection.

After he had meetings with MGM about using that script.

Transformative works exist, I don’t think it works like that.

They plagiarized his fanfiction. Theoretically you would have rights to your stories even if they involve characters that you don’t have rights to.