I don’t think anyone would overlook one of the most mentioned features everywhere for the past three months.
I don’t think anyone would overlook one of the most mentioned features everywhere for the past three months.
He needs a contract to make money. Putting his episodes on YouTube without being paid to do it would benefit Google.
The message he’s sending is: “if you want my show, pay me”.
The $250 he would earn with Adsense on YouTube is irrelevant.
And these are only the OS changes that I care about. I’m sure there are more.
So our options should be to accept a company that prevents us from using 100% of OUR phones, or choosing the crappy competitor?
That’s a lose-lose scenario. Why would anyone defend it?
If we say “not pro repair” is “anti-repair”, we lose the meaning of what being anti-repair is.
Both are not helping the consumer, but one much more than the other.
Animals have rights in almost every country in the world.
More countries should do that. And should also ban Facebook-owned apps, TikTok, and other spyware on those official phones.
Why wouldn’t they?
Before this law, I mean.
You’re missing what they said.
Exactly. If you can’t afford an expensive lawyer, the US wants you to lose.
Actually, it’s not only that they want you to lose. It wants the entire system to be so expensive that you can’t even afford to go to court and lose. You have to settle, and don’t have a lot of power determining the terms.
Cats are nocturnal animals. Sunlight has the opposite effect on them.
It generates feelings associate with sleep time, like being relaxed or drowsy.
That’s the worst case of anxiety I’ve ever seen.
You’re NEVER going to NEED a tab. Just close them.
Nice try, Mr. Hackerman!
I understand e-cigarettes are supposed to help you quit
They’re not.
An e-cigarette is just like a normal cigarette, but you’re not inhaling burned paper. If you were inhaling addictive substances with normal cigarettes, nothing is stopping you from doing the same with an e-cig.
Do they work? In the sense that they “burn” (in quotes) substances and let you inhale them, then yes. That is their purpose.
For platforms with an amount of users in many millions, we need regulations on who can be banned, and for what reasons you can’t.
Even if you are a private citizen, it doesn’t matter. Informations on everyone’s private jets are public information, no matter how “public” of a citizen the owner of the jet is.
This is so American…
“Let me send an SMS, while I ride my horse to go to my bank and do other things that people used to do in 1870.”
“Oh, their SMS color is different! I dislike people with a different color than me.”
There is no concern
The guy was elected!
And that’s how they win. They make everyone else think there’s no concern.
“It’s only group X”. And then later “it’s only groups X and Y”, there’s still no concern. And then “it’s only groups X, Y and Z, we can still outvote them…”
It does, yes.
And since lots of people in the Fediverse support blocking popular competitors, like people in Mastodon talking about blocking/unfederating Threads, I’d say we’re making sure the Fediverse stays in obscurity forever. Never having a chance to become popular, never having a chance to convince people to leave proprietary platforms.
You work to strengthen unions and take down capitalism.