Say there is a car with no human driver, that is being sold as requiring “no human input other than set destination, stop, and go”.

If that vehicle crashes, you think the person who bought the car (the passenger) has legal liability, and not the manufacturer?

That’s like being a passenger on a bus and getting sued if the bus driver hits a parked car.

Are we talking truly autonomous vehicles with no driver, or today’s “self-driving-but-keep-your-hands-on-the-wheel” type cars?

In the case of the former, it should be absolutely the fault of the manufacturer.

Human life is to be protected, rescued etc. in all cases.

Exceptions need to have very clear and very strict rules

Bruh.

Unfortunately, the card mentioned in the article is far too slow to record high resolution, high bit-rate video from even older “pro” cameras.

This claim has not yet been confirmed.

Washington post

Business insider

Your claims about babies and women have not yet been confirmed as factual.

Washington post

Business insider

So you’re saying Israel should glass the entire strip? Ok, got it.

Because collective punishment is totally ok and definitely NOT a war crime.