Or even more obvious, RSVP

LPT: if your dog is being playful and you need to catch them, try running away to have them chase and catch you.

4 was good, 5 was better

They are defined by their electorates

I was speaking of democrats wanting to preserve reproductive rights (privacy) and civil rights for minorities.

I used to believe the Republican party brought much needed conservatism to the table. There were reasonable concerns that the Democratic party was too heavy handed with implementing morality and over reaching laws. The Democratic party has mostly been in the right side of social permissivness since then and the Republican party has gone fucking crazy Reactionary which they have rebranded as “Conservative”. It has become an intersection dynamic where the Democratic party has become a coalition of progressives and conservatives, who just to want to keep the rights they have. Unfortunately there are many “Team R” fans that don’t recognize that their party no longer represents them.

So short answer, the Democratic party has already absorbed the strengths of the Republican party.

4. Not having been determined via impeachment proceedings to be barred from office.

5. Having served less than two terms, however you can serve just under 10 years if you were raised to president more than half way through the term.

My guess

https://www.adweek.com/agencies/akqa-and-grey-merge-capabilities-across-five-territories-as-wpp-continues-efficiencies-drive/

Don’t get me started on windows 9

I don’t really get all the windows 11 hate. I have had 0 problems with it

But does it taste any different? The article makes no claims other than looks.

Ok, so to be clear you only started opposition to Biden since the Israeli invasion of Gaza after October 7th?

I can understand the belief that Biden has been deficient in his response, despite the innumerable competing interests any administration would need to juggling. I had similar issues with Obama’s handling of ISIL, however I also had no better idea of how it could be handled better.

Unions oppose/opposed NATO, especially autoworkers.

Are you thinking NAFTA? I’m not sure unions have much of a position on NATO.

What makes it clear that Biden isn’t a great option? It really annoys me that such a progressive administration in a very divided government is somehow not measuring up to the ever changing goal posts. The only perfect candidate to vote for is yourself, everyone else is a compromise.

It’s just the price they pay for my freedom. /s

The funniest part is that privileged people get pissy about being called by their title all the time, it does sometimes materialize in jokes, but that’s still punching up.

As a fun experiment I misgender bigots until they got mad about it. It doesn’t take long.

Oops, “people who”

Firstly, there are plenty of people who believe that humans have made terrible mistakes when selectively breeding dogs. See the oft-reposted “dog breeds then be now” image. Which leads into the primary technical reason eugenics doesn’t work, the fallibility of human decision making combined with the lack of perfect information.

Some traits may seem undesirable, however biodiversity is very important for survivability, and we are already very non-diverse genetically. Consider sickle cell anemia, a blood disease caused by a genetic trait. However part of the trait that causes it also offers protection from malaria.

Second is the controversial aspect. Who gets to decide which traits are desirable? If left up to individuals we would be awash with poorly informed trends, but if some central authority were given control, it could never be apolitical and would certainly devolve from any scientific basis into ideology.

First you must recognize that your title already contains implicit bias, as Israel’s position is that it is a war against Hamas, while others would prefer to frame it as a war against Palestine. Both are true in a sense, but the choice of which is used is a bias. There is no “unbiased” source for these things, just multiple perspectives and agendas.