![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
12·
1 year agoYes, unfortunately. There is a lot of tooling around it but it still feels bizarre after years of using it.
Yes, unfortunately. There is a lot of tooling around it but it still feels bizarre after years of using it.
Hell yea. Can’t forget those compile times and that parallelism handling. I can’t think of a language that has a better dev cycle to performance ratio.
I love Go precisely because of its simplicity which also makes it highly consistent across different codebases. That said I do like the new direction of adding some features devs are clamoring for with helper functions and memory arenas.
Forgot to mention that compile time…hnngg.
Somehow it’s always the lead software in a category that becomes shitty while everything else is praised. Regardless of what’s being talked about. (I know why)
A vast majority of photos are already staged and have been for a very long time, before phone cameras were a decent replacement. In th cases where accuracy is required phone cameras are rarely used. I don’t see an issue here.