It ““worked”” in France

It still kills most of the userbase when they do it

Normal people don’t know what a fucking dns is

You end up with 10 more new sites and a drop in quality and an endless game of cat & mouse

I’d say it’s a non sequitur

Which is better in what way exactly?

You mean does the 80s-based protocol that doesn’t even support encryption support voice?

It doesn’t support having messages received while you were offline

IRC supports one and one thing only: N-wise chats to connected clients. That and delusional nerds who like to think they’re better than everyone else. Huge support for that too.

People who actually have sane standards for their instant messaging use the Matrix decentralized chat protocol when they need non-proprietary coms, or revolt

And they can react to in-game state as well

If every action produces logs and the logs are given to every npc along with some flags, suddenly,

Just punched a guard? That goes in the context

Player is rich? That’s in the context

Wearing mage clothes? Context

It’s a cool way to increase immersion for not much effort without breaking anything in a traditional game

Maybe the base’s wifi is a weird state operator that has peculiar protocols (ie old or misimplemented)

When I worked on a website with a map on it I used 15

50000kms is the kind of distances you get going around the earth so to get it down to a millimeter precision from 50k I think 8 or 10 digits required?

So I just put 15

Hey there’s long fledged out discussions on the nuances of… how very ethical piracy is

That is one savage fucking title

deleted by creator

Factorio is priced appropriately

It’s less that it never goes on sale, more like it is always on sale

Good

Toilets do a really important job and it is one that I would not enjoy doing myself.

If it’s got a poop fetish then fuck it, I’ll host parties and take suggestions on what too feed guests!

It’s even hornier. Sorry.

Orson Welles? D:

It works but you do it twice when you could do it once

But I expect anyone who’s programmed some pathfinding before to, at the minimum, be able to say “run A* twice”. Somehow AIs never understand the prompt well enough

I think the best option is to make sure to have ‘sorted’ the calls to the fire tiles, you can do that by having them in a separate grid or just stash them to a small local array on stack when you encounter them, and investigate those at the end of the loop

If there’s no result that’s been found under the cost limit without the fire at each point of the algorithm, you do do the recursive calls for the fire as well, and you flag your result as “has fire in it” for the caller on top

When getting a result from your several recursive calls, you take the best non-fire result that’s under 15 tiles long, else you take the best result period

Then once you’re back to the top level call, if there was a non-fire path you will get that result, if there wasn’t you will get that instead

I’ve had 100% failure rate on simple requirements that require a simple spin on well known solutions

“Make a pathfinding function for a 2d grid” - fine

“Make a pathfinding function for a 2d grid, but we can only move 15 cells at a time” - fails on lesser models, it keeps clinging to pulling you the same A* as the first one

“Make a pathfinding function for a 2d grid, but we can only move 15 cells at a time, also, some cells are on fire and must be avoided if possible, but if there is no other path possible then you’re allowed to use fire cells as fallback” - Never works

There for that last one, none of the models give a solution that fits the very simple requirement. It will either always avoid fire or give fire a higher cost, which is not at all a fitting solution

High costs means if you’ve got a path that’s 15 tiles long without fire, but way shorter with fire, then sure, some fire is fine! And if you could walk 15 tiles and go to your destination but need to walk on 1 fire, then it will count that as 15-something and that’s too long.

Except no, that’s not what you asked.

If you try and tell it that, gpt4 flip flops between avoiding fire and touching the price of tiles

It fails because all the literature on pathfinding talks about is the default approach, and cost heuristic functions. That won’t cut it here, you have to touch the meat of the algorithm and no one ever covers that (because that’s just programming, it depends on what you need to do there are infinite ways you could do it, to fit infinite business requirements)

The minecraft server is down :(

Do you know what is theoretically limiting it to 40-45% in the physical process we are using?

“Good 4k tvs without bloat, site:lemm… oh.”