thanks!

I’m willing to go above 2000, 4k display is not really important to me and I care most about Quality × Performance / Price, is lenovo the best with its competitors regarding high Quality × Performance / Price?

solid material to be used 5 year+ withour having to replace anything

All laptops are generally ripoffs

true and very sad, but what is the best Quality × Performance / Price in the choices we have

I have take a look at it recently, really great work framework did, but it really is not high Quality × Performance / Price

Now is the time to scope out used Lenovo thinkbooks if you’re good installing Linux on it.

Thanks for the tip! But in my case I really need a brand new laptop, (because it’s not for me)

To better answer your question, well need to know what you’re using it for in general. Gaming? Coding stuff? Just a social media and TV browsing box? Creating or editing content?

Gaming, Coding, AI… I would need the laptop to perform well under all those circumstances. so basically high end gaming laptop. Could you give me some recommendations?

I need both decent GPU and CPU, so basically high end gaming laptop. Could you give me some recommendations?

But there isn’t a good indicator for Quality × Performance / Price, I really don’t know how to choose in all those options

could you give an example?

barrier of entry and performance act as trade-offs to each others

Didn’t understand this before. Thank you!

thank you!

thanks

thanks!

Thank you! I totally agree with the idea of multiple platforms now. Though it is a pain to use fediverse on a single platform / app now, but I guess this problem will be solved once fediverse is matured enough.

thanks!

Yes I agree but plugin-based development isn’t exactly “put all eggs in one basket”

the problem with fediverse now is there isn’t an easy way to search on all platforms. That troubles me a lot

thanks!

The problem with fediverse now is there isn’t an easy way to search on all platforms. That troubles me a lot

Yes! but still I think fediverse could benefit from plugin-based development. So it would be “Write plugin that do one thing and do it well”

most developers are stuck in the app store mentality

really? the developers I know doesn’t seem to have this problem. They are all like “we should make those thing into one” I guess the opinion in this post came from them as well

So it would be reasonable for people to choose to enable or disable plugins. So if you don’t want to watch videos simply delete the video plugin then the program would work no different than what you desires

Most people actually prefer dedicated apps for different activities, with each app being better suited to the individual task.

I think maybe it is possible for one app to be most suited on everything? I could be wrong