I’ll just use Firefox mobile with uBlock Origin then, literally anything is better than ads

Kraus - Pitch Fucker

Renard - Rainbow Dash Likes Girls (Stay Gay Pony Girl)

Susumu Hirasawa - Day Scanner

Exit polls say the opposition has the majority, in short PiS is gone

Well, I’ve lived through it. We had tried before, and I’ve already voted today. Cut us some slack, PiS polls at around 35%, but due to political fragmentation and the D’Hont system favoring big parties they’ve managed to win two elections. They do not represent the average Pole, definitely not in this day and age.

Then why mention the time period in your original comment?

You say a decade but that’s just two election cycles, in the grand scale of things it’s not that long

It doesn’t need to spread it from nothing, but expand and utilize? Absolutely possible

The US is more to the right on average than Cornel West. He won’t win. Even if that wasn’t the case, people would still mostly vote for the Democratic candidate (in this case Joe Biden), because the Democratic Party is more established and expected to get more votes based on past elections. People are aware of the system used for voting in their country and vote accordingly. Children can understand this, so why are you this obtuse?

Ha ha very funny. Except this is grammatically correct and not ambiguous. It would work with your joke interpretation if it said “who shot dead, unarmed, black man”

deleted by creator

Or you don’t actually have an argument and are posturing.

Most countries around the world have a population smaller than California. The US is just really big. Even then, California alone has about 12% of the entire population of the US, the third most populated country.

If planes are safer than cars, why can’t I fly a Boeing 797-9 Dreamliner?

Chew on that for a while.

I love how this person made a good argument about energy storage and you just responded with speculation and an insult, not actually addressing the point. If it’s the same 3 points, you should be able to perfectly counter their argument without resorting to an ad hominem attack.

Putin Learns Putin Behind Plot To Assassinate Putin

Wagner was Dmitry Utkin’s pseudonym. But I’m sure the guy was talking about Prigozhin.

That’s something you may think if you’re 5 y/o and going on vibes. Every decision you face not only has the consequences if you choose it, but also if you don’t.

A pure hypothetical to demonstrate the general principle on an extreme example (not a direct comparison): you have an election with two candidates: one runs on a promise of Holocaust 2.0 and the other will twist your ankle after he wins. Would you say you can’t choose because both are bad? Obviously you would under any case want to avoid the worse outcome. Because not doing anything is risking that bad outcome, even if the alternative is bad. The upcoming election is not that extreme, but my example should have demonstrated the principle: inaction in face of greater evil is wrong.

There is no absolute good in this world, and if you can’t choose between Kamala Harris and those horrible people you moral compass is out of whack. When you don’t vote, the choice is made for you. Whether something is good or bad has to be evaluated considering possible alternatives, you can’t just not choose and expect a miracle to happen.

Compared to what? Trump? DeSantis? I don’t think so.

Never say never, but I don’t think it matters all that much, with Trump in jail. But to answer your question, incumbent changing their running mate seems tantamount to admitting failure and you want people to view your administration as successful.

“You” doesn’t mean I’m talking to the bot, I’m using it as a general descriptor for a person. I could have said “I understand being cautious with one’s statements”, but that’s very formal and unnecessary in a comment on a social media website. I can easily imagine you reading a sentence like “You need to study really hard to get to Harvard” and think someone is talking to you personally instead of making a general statement.

Communication is a cooperative process, interpreting what others say maliciously and automatically assuming they made a mistake is the definition of “bad faith engagement”.

Edit: to clarify even further: since I commented on the text of the article, I’m replying to the summary. Maybe that’s the part you’re confused by.