Another one was the death of my father, but that’s more depresing.
Another one was the death of my father, but that’s more depresing.
I didn’t particularly enjoy waking up ever. To this day morning is a chore I have to endure, then work (before it was school) and then I finally get to have some time for myself.
I feel you, I get exited to get a fresh sponge for dish wasing
Or when someone asks for directions
When children in our apartment building started saying formal hellos while passing by. I still feel old when they do that…
That really bad taxidermy lion that was / is a meme.
I believe Tom Scott had a video on gif vs jif with good arguments for both. His argument boiled down to what association a person makes when first introduced to the word.
Examples included words like gift (where you say g) and gin (where you say j).
I don’t think there is a correct answer, only an answer. Depending on criteria chosen I can make an argument for either pronunciation.
This, but also I just use my native language punctuation rules and hope for the best.
You can keep your prescriptive linguistic nazism. I’ll enjoy my descriptive freedom.
In all seriousness, prescriptive linguistics have a limit in a sense that language is formed by usage and that’s inherently a “descriptive” process.
It is possible to prescribe language when you’re in a majority of users, but after some critical mass of people there is nothing you can do. Even when they’re technically wrong.
Apparently the creator of the format argued for jif. But then again the g stands for graphics.
Honestly this whole argument just shows to me that english is way too inconsistent with it’s spelling vs pronunciation. Which is maddening coming from a language where letters correspond one to one to sounds you make.
To defend myself, I’m not a native speaker and we only have a single word for both conceps. So to me these are synonyms because my language doesn’t differentiate between the two.
Even after looking up some definitions they pretty synonymous to me.
Oof… My language doesn’t differentiate between types of envy, we have one word. So I cannot even translate this.
That’s how language works. You could say that a similar thing happened to the suffix -core. Where originally it was ment to be used with one word – a certain musical genre. Now, however, I can append it to anything and it means just a general esthetic.
As for rougelike, it no longer means a game that’s like Rouge. It means a game where you losing means starting over, where playing more doesn’t necessarily mean the game gets easier due to accumulated XP, wealth, gear or whatevet other mechanic.
deleted by creator
After how the Withcher was butchered, I’d like to see less adaptations.
Nah, my keyboard has too many buttons as is
Street vendors beat chains every time
How is IAs approach much different to that of a regular library?
True, they were digitising physical books and lending copies. But this is not much different from how a regular library works (assuming controlled digital lending, yeah I heard aboud Covid period 😕).
I’m not an expert on American law (know nothing about it), but reading the articles and comments I thing there’s an argument to be made for IA functioning as a library.
To me it’s glorified autocomplete. I see LLM as a potencial way of drastically lowering barrier of entry to coding. But I’m at a skill level that coercing a chatbot into writing code is a hiderance. What I need is good documentation and good IDE statical analysis.
I’m still waiting on a good, IDE integrated, local model that would be capable of more that autompleting a line of code. I want it to generate the boiler plate parts of code and get out of my way of solving problems.
What I don’t want, is a fucking chatbot.