• 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle


  • It really isn’t. Smith argued (I agree wrongly) that the invisible hand of a free market would correct everything, but that monopolies and restrictions distort the market and that the worst thing we could do would be to allow corporations to dictate law. That was my point. The US has set up too many barriers to entry to reasonably claim it is free market, and corporations have absolute control over the current government.

    Any reasonable reading of Smith’s Wealth of Nations would be socialist anyway. He outright stated that the capital class had a responsibility to entirely pay for the expenses of the state in caring for the populace.

    The better discussion of Smith would be what industries could reasonably be capable of sustaining an actually free market. I would argue that housing, communications, agriculture, and healthcare are impossible to de-monopolize due to practical spatial limitations and therefore would have to be under state control, given Smith’s statement that capitalism’s invisible hand only works in a free market.



  • Publicly traded companies are legally bound to prioritize shareholder demands ahead of any other duties.

    This is actually a myth. They are expected to be responsible with their money, but they are not in any way required to maximize profit from a legal perspective. They repeat the lie because it is a good excuse to be evil. If a company doesn’t do what it’s shareholders like, they may vote out the board, or they might sue if the prospective was fraudulent (said they were working on something that they weren’t for example… But remember also that American companies don’t make forward statements like European ones do, so those cases are going to be things like “last year we spent 10 million on R&D” when they actually spent the money on plane trips to cocaine parties) but those are the recourses available to shareholders.




  • I live in the EU now, coming from the US. The US is almost comically backward. The effectiveness of its propaganda is incredible, that the people living there really don’t know what the rest of the world is like. Yes, I have been to Mexico. I’ve also been to towns in northern New Mexico where the majority of the population doesn’t have electricity or phone service. I’ve been to countries where much of the population lived in poverty, but most of them they still had phones at least. I’d say the US is currently just above mid tier from the perspective of median income vs cost of living. In the developed countries I’ve been to, even when they have lower incomes, they at least have much lower cost of living to make up for it. The US has got to be the most expensive place I’ve ever spent time in, except maybe Denmark. So yes, income is high, but I doubt seriously that there are many places less affordable for median-income residents, at least in the developed world.