![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
It’s not redundant. Harms compound. It’s not like people max out their carcinogenic index or something. 🙄
It’s not redundant. Harms compound. It’s not like people max out their carcinogenic index or something. 🙄
not worse than booze.
is not doing your argument any favors.
Maybe “something” = “at high risk of getting stick?”
The free will myth is especially damaging, as it steers people away from pragmatic solutions and towards blame and punitive policies.
I think I’m you just mean T. What’s an LGB surgury?
Autonomous cats are now common in a couple of cities. No reason to think it won’t expand to more. Why not LA?
More likely, one person spent time and effort, and someone else spent money.
Using the correct title would have made clear that it wasnt referring to the flatulence of the eater though. 🤔
Or maybe the number bus and tram lines increased, and the train systems expanded. “One person, one car” is a mentality we should all be saying “fuck that” to.
Public transit and shared autonomous car usage.
Less cars, more trees, more happiness.
I see a cylinder bit an obelisk.
The first line in the article says a “new study.” So are you sure it’s not this paper? Also, have to say the paper title is kind of a duh moment.
I haven’t clicked through, but I bet they meant “producing meat.”
I would’ve guessed it was for looking hot.
So why is that your preference? You didn’t really say.