Theyre pretty fuckin interchangable

Tom Cruise

Oh, raw meat for sure. I wouldnt feed a pet raw anything unless I got a vets thumbs up, cooked is safer across the board.

I thought it meant meat, period.

Wait, is it bad to feed pigs meat? I thought they were natural omnivores. Is this about an issue of feeding them spoiled meat? Or is this the whole “feed a body to a pig” thing?

Cause if someones cleaning murders with pigs, they arent worried about its legality.

There is a running cultural gag of mothers doing this to their own children. Which is a running gag because most people with siblings have had their parents do this in real life.

I dunno man, I think my mom loves me more than biden knows sitting presidents. It might just be a common memory glitch that human brains do

Maybe dont skim lemmy while drinking, youve misread this very very very hard

We are inherently violent in the sense that inherently, we need to understand violence.

We arent inherently violent in that we dont inherently choose violence before all else.

We need violence, evolutionarily, to hunt and to stop ourselves from being hunted. We are also a heavily social species, which requires ask first punch later mentalities.

If we were intrinsically violent, we wouldnt have cities. We wouldnt have even reached that level of collaboration before killing one another.

Human violence comes about, largely, due to aggression being the “safer” reaction to fear. Pre society, fear happens when threatened with death, and violence usually stops that. Be it death via hunger so violence kills a meal, or death via predator so violence defends you.

We still have that knee jerk response to fear, but now what scares us isnt actually a death threat. So we accidentally treat the unknown like it wants to kill us.

We arent intrinsically violent, we are too easily scared.

And you prevent fear of the unknown, typically, with education.

Or lose their salaries, as an employee who could have been doing campaign work is now stuck sifting through mail all day.

At that point the goal is to so entirely overwhelm the secretary that they become incapable of doing any real work, needing to wade through mail all day each day to make sure nothing of serious importance is missed in the sea of angry voters.

If you do it right, you actually waste the time of 2 or more employees on their weekly schedule. It literally costs them money to ignore you.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

… Hey, how bad are your delusions that you think chocolate is people?

Removed by mod

You could start by actually making an attempt at good faith discussion, instead of pedantic attempts to hide from the point.

But we both know you dont want to do that, because youre not actually here for productive discussion.

Nice, more bad faith misinterpreting of the point

The irony is immense.

You arent actually putting forward a productive premise, of course no one is treating it as such

This article is talking about the current population squeeze, and how this has happened twice in the past. As in, 10,000+ years ago.

There is no new emminent threat to cheetahs. There are well funded global cheetah breeding programs that are successfully breeding cheetahs with their unique genetic restrictions in mind.

Professional ecologists are well underway toward repairing cheetah populations. They arent going to go extinct