- 1 Post
- 51 Comments
1344·10 months agoMuch as I loathe Putin, he has yet to do anything this savage.
Crying whataboutism is just a lame attempt to deflect attention from hypocrisy and bullshit.
If there’s one thing Americans love to spend money on it’s war
It’s not spending, it is investing.
Regards, The Military Industrial Complex
They were told to leave their homes and go to the city Centre. Then the city Centre was bombed.
Mr Trudeau told the Canadian parliament the country’s intelligence agencies were investigating whether “agents of the government of India” were involved in the killing of Nijjar.
I thought he already claimed he had credible evidence, from one of their 5 eyes cohorts, that India was behind it.
America should file a copyright claim
Rupert Murdoch and an unsourced report probably cobbled together from the previous two
criticized
In this case trivial shit motivated by fear, jealousy and hate spread by US government friendly media organisations and amplified by bots and shills eager to get their percentage of America’s $300,000,000 anti-China propaganda budget.
Of course the US doesn’t censor news, they don’t need to when a compliant media simply doesn’t report things their leaders don’t like.
I didn’t say censorship was good, I said western media will pick up any shit it can find in order to bash China while ignoring anything positive that might come from there. It’s not just China, they do the same for everywhere that US/Nato doesn’t like. A small handful of corporations controlling everything you know about the world.
Anything that could possibly show China in a potentially positive light is routinely ignored. That is censorship.
Lol, the Asian Games have been a roaring success in Hangzhou for nearly two weeks. From a spectacular opening ceremony to the joy of the athletes competing in an open and friendly environment, it been studiously ignored by the so-called global media yet they wallow in this like pigs in shit.
You all love to call anyone who is vaguely pro China (or anywhere else US/Nato doesn’t like) shills but the whole of western corporate media are nothing less.
https://youtu.be/HXyqXsDmVNs?feature=shared
Have fun with the video then downvote me like the free person that you are.
How desperately will the western media scrape the barrel to find something/anything to criticise China for.
a letter showed and four diplomats confirmed on Tuesday.
It’s funny, whenever the corporate media quote people from countries the US doesn’t like they always say things like “… XX accused, without citing any evidence.” But then they expect us to believe a letter, which is not shown, and four anoymous diplomats constitute evidence.
That is just appaling journalism.
At least in China they get busted instead of bailed out
Having seen the heartbreaking destruction (as well as illegal logging) of ancient rainforest in Malaysia to make way for palm oil plantations, this can only be a good thing.
It’s difficult, most of what you read in western media is misleading or outright bollocks. Anything that doesn’t follow the approved narrative is buried, ignored or branded fake news.
The problem is that just three global news agencies are responsible for the overwhelming majority of global news. Two of them AP and Reuters are American the other, AFP is owned by the French government. Between them these three decide what you see or don’t see.
This applies to everywhere the US/Nato doesn’t like, not just China
I’m sorry, your use of the words ‘Beijing colony’ implied you had little knowledge of Hong Kong’s history. It wouldn’t surprise me given the selective reporting of western media.
But for the present I can assure you that one country two systems is alive and well. Further more Beijing has promised it will continue beyond the originally agreed date of 2047, That is one of the things that western media chooses not to report. What really changed was that after intense lobbying by CIA/NED sponsored activists the US ended Hong Kong’s independent trading status and lumped it together with the rest of China. In the process hurting the very people they pretended to care about.
I think you will find that every government in the world is obsessed with national security. For 22 years Hong Kong didn’t have a national security law at all. They had tried to pass one after the 1997 handover but it was shelved after protests. If it hadn’t been for the 2019 riots it probably still wouldn’t have been passed but Beijing insisted. But it is not the sweeping, draconian law that western media claims it is. They have never actually told anyone what is in it or linked to it so I will, it is only 27 pages but since it only contains four components I will summarise it for for you;
No treason No sedition No terrorism No colluding with or accepting funds from foreign sources
Sedition is a holdover from British colonial rule, the other three didn’t exist at all. It is actually a lot less draconian or sweeping than that of the UK or the US who are still in the process of extraditing Julian Assange for exposing their war crimes.
Nevertheless the west still insists that the law put an end to the protests but all it really did was put an end to the protest funding. Two other factors were involved. One was the onset of the pandemic but more importantly when Hong Kong rioters, who had been throwing bricks and molotovs and setting fire to subway stations (with people still in them), saw what happened to actual peaceful protestors in the US black lives matter and the UK extinction rebellion protests they all lost heart, their shrieks of Hong Kong police brutality looked ridiculous. So the ringleaders fled leaving their pawns to pay the price.
It’s also worth remembering the HongKongFP website is still operating in Hong Kong despite being deeply critical of both China and Kong Kong’s governments and even the South China Morning Post, which is owned by a mainland company is often critical of both.
It is also worth remembering that the US government spends US$300 million a year just on anti-China propaganda
Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region in China.
“Fans” who object to that are fans that are not worth having