• NAXLAB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Post rationalization perhaps?

    It could also be similar to the logic of phrenology, where they pointed at objective measurements of various features of people’s skulls to make wild conclusions about the superiority or inferiority of different races. It’s not that they were falsifying the measurements, they just skipped a step and treated the sensibilities of the most privileged and influential members of society as objective fact.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Logical fallacies do not involve themselves in questions of worthiness, usefulness, goodnesss, etc.

    If the fallacy relies on this pattern of detecting necessary and unnecessary, then it is not a logical fallacy.

    • SeahorseTreble@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think they can certainly apply to any situation where the logic is flawed, so arguing that something is necessary since it’s part of another system which itself is unnecessary, is a logical fallacy

      If we accept that something is a necessary component of an unnecessary system, but then use that fact to argue that the component is necessary in absolute terms, that’s a logical fallacy given that it’s not absolutely necessary if the system it’s a part of isn’t absolutely necessary

      After researching I found it can be called a false necessity fallacy or false requirement fallacy

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the term you’re looking for is tunnel vision.

      It refers to committing resources to interpretation of the world around a single immovable assumption.