• Ruud@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I do host some stuff myself 😉 but there’s one thing to keep in mind.

    Don’t self host stuff that your family still needs after you’re gone. Unless they are self host nerds like you. I stopped self hosting our mail and docs for example.

    Would you agree?

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree, and I think there’s some reliability arguments for certain services, too.

      I’ve been using self-hosted Bitwarden. That’s something I really want to be reliable anywhere I happen to be. I don’t want to rely on my home Internet connection always being up and dyn DNS always matching. An AWS instance or something like that which can handle Bitwarden would be around $20/month (it’s kinda heavy on RAM). Bitwarden’s own hosting is only $3.33/month for a family plan.

      Yes, Bitwarden can work with its local cache only, but I don’t like not being able to sync everything. It’s potentially too important to leave to a residential-level Internet connection.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Is your home connection down that much? I’d think that even syncing once every day or so would populate everything fine, and if you’re at home it should update over wifi.

        I might just be spoiled because I’m the only one using mine and only for a handful of devices.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not really, I just have trust issues with my ISP, and I’m willing to spend three bucks a month to work around them.

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’d agree but you can expand this quite widely then. You think they don’t need their pictures anymore, in case you host something like Immich/Photoprism? If you host movies, series, games, they may not need them anymore but it would still be noticeable that they are not accessible anymore.

      Not that I am saying you are wrong or what a good way of doing that would be. I don’t know myself.

      • rho50@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ideally you want something that gracefully degrades.

        So, my media library is hosted by Plex/Jellyfin and a bunch of complex firewall and reverse proxy stuff… And it’s replicated using Syncthing. But at the end of the day it’s on an external HDD that they can plug into a regular old laptop and browse on pretty much any OS.

        Same story for old family photos (Photoprism, indexing a directory tree on a Synology NAS) and regular files (mostly just direct SMB mounts on the same NAS).

        Backups are a bit more complex, but I also have fairly detailed disaster recovery plans that explain how to decrypt/restore backups and access admin functions, if I’m not available (in the grim scenario, dead - but also maybe just overseas or otherwise indisposed) when something bad happens.

        Aside from that, I always make sure that all of all the selfhosting stuff in my family home is entirely separate from the network infra. No DNS, DHCP or anything else ever runs on my hosting infra.