There’s no freedom in having to do something but you’re also not free to choose your wants.

Maybe it’s better to just live and let life happen instead of thinking about what could’ve been. What ever happened is the only thing that could’ve happened.

  • Ezergill@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean, you chose to taste it again when you knew you didn’t like the taste. That’s how acquired tastes work, you start liking something after repeated exposure.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I wanted to be the kind of person that drinks coffee like everyone else around me back then. I didn’t choose that want. That desire was imposed on me from the outside.

      • Ezergill@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It still was your choice, people regularly go against the societal norms and desires imposed from the outside. Like, I never started smoking, although both of my parents and a lot of my peers did.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, I disagree. I didn’t choose not to start smoking. I simply never developed the desire to start. It’s not something I decided against my natural preferences.

          It’s besides the point anyway. Even if I could choose to do or not do something it would still be about what I want which aligns with the title of the post.

          You can’t do something you don’t want unless someone makes you do it. Even if you do something like go to the gym despite not wanting there’s a greater want behind it that’s pushing you to do it. In this case getting healthy and fit. This means you do want to go to the gym, you just don’t like it.

          • Ezergill@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            The point was to illustrate a counter-example to your coffee example and that you can control (at least some) of your wants (which you previously said that one can’t do). I would be curious to hear your definition of want (and have to, for that matter). You seem to be using it as an umbrella term that covers everything from physical urges to something a person thinks would subjectively benefit them.

            • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              By have to I mean obligations. You’ve got a meeting at noon, you have to be there. You may not want to, but you have to.

              By want I mean every other voluntary action. You’re thirsty and you open the fridge. There’s milk, water and orange juice. Say you grab the orange juice. You did that because you wanted it. To say that you could have chosen milk or water isn’t true. You didn’t want those, you wanted orange juice. If you rewind the clock and open the fridge again you’d still want the orange juice. In that moment you can’t do other than what you want. You can’t choose to not want it. It may be than in a few years you no longer like orange juice so in thay sense your wants may change but then and there in that moment you can’t act against it.

              Even if you decide against your preferences to prove a point you’d still be acting according to your wants; you want to prove me wrong and thus you grab the water. That’s still doing what you wanted to do.

              • Ezergill@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                If by “want” you mean “everything you do that you don’t have to” then your post is kinda useless. Yeah, you do things you have to and things you don’t have to, that’s obvious, cause there is no other category of actions.

                • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Well I can’t think of a voluntary action that people do for any other reason than either wanting to do it or having to do it. That’s the point of the post. Every example I have been given so far is either of those two. It feels like we’re free do to what ever, but in reality we’re only free to do what we want and nobody picked their wants.

                  Nobody is forcing me to reply to this message. I do it because I want to. If I didn’t want to I wouldn’t but I also don’t know why I enjoy having these debates. I didn’t choose to enjoy it, I just do.

                  Just give me an example of something you do or could do that you don’t have to but also don’t want to. I don’t think you can. You’re not free to do that.

                  • Ezergill@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    The problem is with you definition of want. You’ve formulated it based on the conclusion you’ve wanted to reach - that there is no other reason to do things, not based on what you actually think it is. That’s why I asked for your definition - to try to find a counter example, without you moving the goalpost and saying that that’s actually a want as well.