• knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bury it deep enough to lock the carbon in. If you spend it, those dollars will eventually find their way back to the treasury where they’ll be burned.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The only ways you can fight climate change in any meaningful way with 10k also involve going to prison

    • rekabis@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      10k is cutting it thin… the Accuracy International ACSR is just a hair under $10k USD… and that is before taxes. Then you need the 1,000-10,000 rounds of ammo for training before you become good enough to start taking out card-carrying members of the Parasite Class from a kilometre-plus distance.

      Now granted, you can go a lot cheaper than that, but accuracy and range will suffer. Remember, you want to be far enough away that you can reliably pack up and sanitize the scene before you leave.

      Alternatively, swarming AI drones in the hundreds, with on-board explosive packages, would allow you to deploy from abandonable emplacements that can loiter for many hours to even days. No-one is going to question a cube van that sits in a paid spot for a week, at least until it’s roof opens up and a thousand tiny drones with facial recognition take off and take out a few oligarchs.

      But honestly, you’re likely talking a few tens of thousands for that scenario, at minimum. I would likely bank at it being in the low hundreds of thousands for a truly effective and difficult-to-counter deployment.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh there’s rent. Most US prisons charge per diem rates for housing, and they charge for many “services” and they charge literal extortion rates. Prisoners leave US prisons deeeeeply in debt

      • pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I wouldn’t even want to be in an Austrian luxury prison. There’s a reason why people have went as far as dying while fighting for their freedom, it’s one of our most precious possessions.

    • rekabis@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      10k is cutting it thin… the Accuracy International ACSR is just a hair under $10k USD… and that is before taxes. Then you need the 1,000-10,000 rounds of ammo for training before you become good enough to start taking out card-carrying members of the Parasite Class from a kilometre-plus distance.

      Now granted, you can go a lot cheaper than that, but accuracy and range will suffer. Remember, you want to be far enough away that you can reliably pack up and sanitize the scene before you leave.

      Alternatively, swarming AI drones in the hundreds, with on-board explosive packages, would allow you to deploy from abandonable emplacements that can loiter for many hours to even days. No-one is going to question a cube van that sits in a paid spot for a week, at least until it’s roof opens up and a thousand tiny drones with facial recognition take off and take out a few oligarchs.

      But honestly, you’re likely talking a few tens of thousands for that scenario, at minimum. I would likely bank at it being in the low hundreds of thousands for a truly effective and difficult-to-counter deployment.

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think that depends on your skill, i.e. good planning, and obviously execution. If you’re really good, you don’t even get caught, although that might help politically as we currently see with Mangione

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Depends on where you live and your situation. You either limit your personal CO2 or the society’s CO2 or even both. Most of my suggestions will make or save you money over time.

    For personal you could do these, most of these will pay themselves back within 10 years in savings.

    • Swap gas stove for induction stove
    • Swap a gas boiler to heat pump + electric boiler
    • Buy solar panels for the roof and/or battery
    • Heat pump for domestic heating for colder regions.
    • Home insulation such as triple glass windows
    • For hot regions getting an awning for the windows facing the sun goes a long way.
    • Selling car to buy EV (CO2 neutral at 1 year, less CO2 after that)
    • Buying an E-bike if you have short trips and would like to bike more (CO2 negative almost instantly if you prevent car trips)

    Otherwise if you don’t feel like any of those investing in solar companies or battery production companies will make it easier for them to finance expansions to their operations and maybe even make you some money along the way.

    If you live in the UK or applicable countries getting in on Octopus energy co-op energy production is a good way to invest the money and reduce CO2 at the same time.

    Don’t forget that an easy way to limit your carbon footprint is free. Notably plastics, aluminum, steel, other metals, concrete and beef.

    To limit society’s footprint you can show up to city Council meetings and advocate for bike paths and public transport which really goes a long way. Showing up with a couple of buddies, making them talk and buying beer for them after in one of the most cost effective ways to stop climate change. Often city council members just need some people to back them up when proposing the CO2 negative urban planning improvements.

    Stopping climate change is all about taking small steps towards the solution, asking this question on lemmy is a great start.

  • DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Use it to free your own time to plant trees or contribute in another way. Spending 10k isn’t gonna reduce climate change, but being able to work on the problem yourself will.

  • tomi000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    As I havent seen a single actually effective answer:

    Donate it to organisations fighting climate change. For example FCA (researching climate friendly ways of producing cement, steel, fuels), gfi (researching food alternatives), CATF (tries to influence political changes)

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you have any natural gas appliances in your home (like water heater, dryer, stove, oven, HVAC), transition to an electric version. Cancel your gas service.

    • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah that should offset the massive pollution from global industry right? I feel that the shift of responsibility to the individual is a distraction.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        These are ways to immediately reduce your carbon footprint with $10,000, which is what OP asked for. There is absolutely no “shift of responsibility” involved in deciding to stop giving natural gas manufacturers and distributors your money.

        • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          Please show me where OP asked for ways to “immediately reduce their carbon footprint.”

          That is not what was requested in the post title. “Carbon Footprint” is a piece of propaganda perpetuated by the biggest industry offenders to shift blame to the individual and distract from their own massively disproportionate contribution to climate change.

          • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            That totally ignores the demand side of the equation. If people didn’t want to buy X believe me, they wouldn’t sell X. I’m pretty sure the horse and buggy industry and cathode ray tube tv industries would’ve loved to have kept selling their products.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I can’t help but notice you’ve contributed nothing productive to this conversation. Industries and companies have carbon footprints too. A carbon footprint is how much CO2 is generated by x. OP has $10,000 and control over themselves. They’re not going to be stopping Chevron. Jesus man

            • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              7 days ago

              So you’re gonna skip over the part where I was right and you were plainly wrong?

              If I were to suggest an actually productive solution with a $10k budget, my comment would be removed and I’d be on a list. We both know what that means.

              • protist@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                It means 1) you lack the imagination to describe your ideas with any nuance and 2) you’re the kind of guy who tells other people to put themselves in danger while sitting behind your keyboard doing nothing

                • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  You have a very interesting way of ascribing motive here. You say I lack imagination, I say you have an excess of imagination.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Enjoy the money and tell yourself its not your fault.

    Or alternatively, become an eco-terrorist.

    Think of:

    • Pipelines - buy explosives

    • Certain individuals pertaining to the oil industry - buy a firearms

    • Certain politicians - buy firearms

    I am not a lawyer, this comment is for entertainment pur-

    Hmm, why is there loud knocking on my door?

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    You cannot have any significant impact with 10,000$ use it to enjoy your life. We are all doomed anyway.

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This is bs, please dont spread misinformation like this. With your logic, we should all stop voting because a single vote doesnt have impact.

      Every person is responsible for their own decisions and 10k from a single person have a huge relative impact. If every person with 10k available would use those for fighting climate change, we would have overcome it already.

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I actually made a separate comment with my suggestions^^. I think political change and research would have the most impact, so my proposal would be donating to organizations like FCA or CATF (which btw I already do with monthly payments to a climate fund because Ive been asking myself a similar question in the past)

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Those are all valid points but I dont think thats what OPs question was about. They asked about effective ways to fight climate change. Not doing anything can never be an answer to that. Whether or not it makes sense to spend your hard earned money on other peoples behalf is a different question.

          Also, no we are not doomed. Yes, climate change will have a huge impact on humankind, but earth wont randomly explode or something. Humankind will adjust to higher temperatures and more frequent natural disasters, but the extent to which this will affect everyone can still be minimized. The poor will be fucked the hardest, ‘accepting our fate’ and not doing anything will cost millions more lives than it could.