• n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    The employees ARE being compelled to work under threat. It might not be dictionary definition slavery, which is why the article calls it one of the “contemporary forms of slavery”.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, they are not. They can stop working; they just won’t be able to continue their job under more-favorable conditions.

      • Evie @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re such a moron, it’s sickening how you could be sooo stupid…

      • Aldehyde@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        American slaves could have stopped working whenever they wanted; they only wouldn’t have been able to continue not being whipped

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Definitions of slavery don’t necessarily require there to be legal ownership of another. Never has.

        Don’t make your own ignorance everyone else’s problem.

        Even if all you did was read the title (which I strongly believe to be the case for you), you maybe noticed the words “contemporary” and “formS

        What types of questions do you think those words would mean to a curious person engaging with the content in good faith?