[deleted]

  • RodgeGrabTheCat 🇨🇦🏴‍☠️@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think the right to have a gun should also include the legal requirement to take and pass a tactical shoot course. No point in having a gun if one can’t hit their target in a stressful situation. Paper target shooting isn’t good enough.

    • Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Should it be state funded? Or should only people who can afford it be allowed to exercise their rights?

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’ll go further, and say the text of the 2nd Amendment implies gun owners should be members of a well-regulated militia. I think every State Guard should accept anyone who applies, and give them basic training. In exchange for being part of the reserve, and passing firearm classes, you can keep and bear arms.

      If you don’t want to be part of a well-regulated militia, no guns. If you can’t pass firearm training, no guns.

      • 100% agree. This morning I was thinking about a reply (didn’t have time before leaving for work) along these lines. But more of reporting to any nearby active shooter situation and helping the cops in exchange for a free gun and training. I like your idea as well.