![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
The lucky sod.
The lucky sod.
I was actually kinda pissed when I had to switch to a car with a CD player and couldn’t use it anymore.
I have a feeling abridged series are on average better than the originals.
It was kinda funny when lemmy was just taking in the reddit exodus crowd and people were complaining that their front page was full of German and Polish posts.
Festivity Doctrine, if you will.
It’s incredibly annoying, though, that you can only copy boards in the app, and when you do it makes triplicate of all the cards.
Yeah, I heard it was the next big scifi trilogy, but when I read it it was like “Really? This?”
I get the distinct impression that some people are simply unable to concieve of a perspective different from their own. For lack of a better comparison, it’s like those Christian movies where everyone, including the atheist, openly believes God exists, but the atheist chooses to be an atheist out of spite or malice or whatever. So for some, disagreement is at best you being a troll or shill or bot, and at worst a frontal attack at their entire conception of the world.
Honestly, kind of impressive.
You mean decacelsius?
The problem isn’t the effect, the problem is you don’t seem to understand what it actually does. The idea is to reduce the price in such a way that a small discount appears larger, increase sales, and make the reduction back in volume. It works, and makes sense, and is done, if and only if you compete on price and trade in volume.
Your title is, at the time of writing: “People live their whole lives watching corporations end prices with 99 yet when they list their own items for sale they choose a whole round number and never question it.” This thread is full of people giving you reasons why they don’t or wouldn’t do that, meaning they clearly do question it, and are deciding against it.
Not if the intention is to make it look expensive. Bugatti’s don’t sell fot 499999.
No, this is proving the use case different: Your logic would put the car at 9995, to present it as cheap. The actual advice is to put it at 12000, higher, to present it as expensive, and then “allow” the buyer to haggle you down.
Taking out a large swarm of (presumably, nuclear armed) bombers quickly.
…NGL that kinda sounds fun
How the hell is that allowable as a ruling? “Wouldn’t it be crazy if we made it legal - just kiddin haha - unless…”?
Very creative, I like it.
My go-tos would be MSF, ICRC, and UNHCR.
Though I kinda wanna ask why the question?
DauT is my spirit animal