Yeah kinda burying the lede on this. Cars built in the 70s had a much more simple, serviceable construction.

By the time you let it go, it was also probably grandfathered in to emissions requirements because it’s a classic car.

Anything from the 90s- 2010 will not hold up like that one did.

You can read that as the meme reference and the dictionary meaning of relations.

Germans have a great sense of humor, you just have to listen for a bit.

Mixing in some Ikea bulbs on the hue bridge will work just fine as well, with both Google and home assistant. The Ikea switches and sensors are paired directly to a bulb, so don’t buy those if you do get their bulbs.

Well we just found out who doesn’t pay attention to their security briefings

Or those are all things he wants to happen…

Some speaker wire, like 18awg stranded is more than enough to extend to the next led strip, if each of your strips is 40w or so you can run quite a few.

The strips themselves probably can’t transmit more than double their own draw, but the strip should tell you max length on it somewhere.

Well I guess you can see how much experience I have running a donkey show… I will defer to your expertise.

A two donkey trailer is the same width as a single occupancy trailer.

Three shows you might start needing bigger transport.

The pedo shit already happened in the 90s, no chance of that changing

Sure. But protest organizers have a responsibility to create a clear policy and communicate this policy in an open carry state, and they also have a responsibility to properly vet any people that do communicate that they will attend with a firearm.

The volunteer open carry person was not trained, and was not given any instruction as simple as “return fire only” or “do not shoot first”.

That’s false.

https://www.kuer.org/news/2025-06-20/judge-orders-release-of-arturo-gamboa-in-no-kings-protest-shooting-case

He didn’t make any attempt to hide when he took out his gun, did not load it, and when they didn’t charge him after he was arrested a judge ordered him to be released.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines violence as "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual

So coercion and other completely verbal applications of power are violence.

It’s not really semantics, it’s just the whole definition is more encompassing than the most basic/ ubiquitous case of the thing.

I’ll be fucked if I ever use a camera app only. I need to set my network to black hole outgoing traffic from the one reolink camera I have before I plug it back in.

yall need log scaling

Oh lol sorry dude, my bad

Yeah that’s devastating.

Buddy, you said you don’t understand the position, so I told you what the position was and it’s easy to understand.

You don’t agree with it, and i don’t have an opinion either way other than it’s a valid perspective.

Not sure why you are trying to convince me. I won’t be convinced that someone’s opinion is wrong, or moral stance is wrong. It’s well reasoned enough and aims to reduce harm. They can have at it.

And when you don’t get it retroactively?

Ok so you do understand it, but you are dismissing the concern. That’s fine.

For the prior consent part, consent requires active and willful assent to the act being effectuated. By the constraints of existence, children can not consent to be created. It’s an order of operations issue.

The act of consent is not asking. The act of consent is being told, yes you can do that to me.

Buddy

My point is the anti natalists have the perspective that the risk of suffering is not worth imposing on a new human.

You saying that assessment is overblown does not change their perspective. It’s simple enough that with a bit of thought you can understand it, if you end up agreeing or not.

If you are using the phrase “I don’t understand” an a synonym of “I don’t agree with that stance” then I’m wasting my time.